Suppr超能文献

血小板浓缩物未实施病原体灭活的原因分析。

Analysis of reasons for not implementing pathogen inactivation for platelet concentrates.

作者信息

Lozano M, Cid J

机构信息

Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, University Clinic Hospital, Agustí Pi i Sunyé Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Transfus Clin Biol. 2013 May;20(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

Abstract

In the last 10 years three technologies capable of inactivating pathogens in platelet concentrates have been authorized in Europe although only one based on the addition of amotosalen and illumination with ultraviolet A (UVA) light, has been approved by the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM). An intense debate exists about the implementation of pathogen inactivation technologies for labile blood components in general and for platelet concentrates in particular. In this review, we will analyze some of the most frequently argued reasons for not implementing pathogen inactivation for platelet components, i.e.: current platelet components are safe enough; pathogen inactivation technologies might be toxic for the recipient; and pathogen inactivation technologies affect platelet function and increase the risk of bleeding. The analysis and discussion of the evidence currently available to answer those reservations will be limited to the pathogen inactivation technology based on amotosalen and UVA.

摘要

在过去十年中,三种能够使血小板浓缩物中的病原体失活的技术已在欧洲获得批准,不过只有一种基于添加氨甲环酸并结合紫外线A(UVA)照射的技术,得到了国家药品和健康产品安全局(ANSM)的批准。对于一般的不稳定血液成分,尤其是血小板浓缩物,关于实施病原体灭活技术存在激烈的争论。在这篇综述中,我们将分析一些最常被提及的反对对血小板成分实施病原体灭活的理由,即:当前的血小板成分足够安全;病原体灭活技术可能对接受者有毒;病原体灭活技术会影响血小板功能并增加出血风险。对现有证据的分析和讨论,以回答这些疑虑,将仅限于基于氨甲环酸和UVA的病原体灭活技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验