Departamento de Ciencias Agricolas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, Colombia.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Jul;13(4):688-95. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12099. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) are a rich source of SSR sequences, but the proportion of long Class I microsatellites with many repeats vs. short Class II microsatellites with few repeats is an important factor to consider. Class I microsatellites, with more than 20 bp of repeats, tend to make better markers with higher polymorphism. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of Class I and Class II microsatellites in a collection of over 21,000 ESTs from a single study of five different tissues of common bean: two types of leaves, nodules, pods and roots. For this objective, we used three different bioinformatics pipelines: Automated Microsatellite Marker Development (AMMD), Batchprimer3 and SSRLocator. In addition, we determined the frequency of single or multiple SSRs in the assembled ESTs, the frequency of perfect and compound repeats and whether Class I microsatellites were mainly di-nucleotide or tri-nucleotide motifs with each of the search engines. Primers were designed for a total of 175 microsatellites concentrating on class I microsatellites identified with SSR locator. A few other microsatellites were included from the other search engines, AMMD and Batchprimer3 programs so as to have a representative set of class II markers for comparison sake. The comparison of 95 class I vs. 80 class II markers confirmed that the Class I were more polymorphic and therefore more useful.
表达序列标签 (EST) 是 SSR 序列的丰富来源,但长的 Class I 微卫星与许多重复序列与短的 Class II 微卫星与少数重复序列的比例是一个需要考虑的重要因素。Class I 微卫星,重复序列超过 20 个碱基,往往具有更高的多态性,成为更好的标记。本研究的目的是确定在来自于对普通菜豆的五个不同组织的单个研究的超过 21000 个 EST 集合中 Class I 和 Class II 微卫星的频率。为此,我们使用了三种不同的生物信息学管道:自动微卫星标记开发(AMMD)、Batchprimer3 和 SSRLocator。此外,我们确定了在组装的 EST 中单个或多个 SSR 的频率、完美和复合重复的频率以及 Class I 微卫星是否主要是与每个搜索引擎的二核苷酸或三核苷酸基序。总共为 175 个微卫星设计了引物,主要集中在 SSR locator 识别的 Class I 微卫星上。从其他搜索引擎,AMMD 和 Batchprimer3 程序中也包括了一些其他的微卫星,以便为比较起见有一个代表的 Class II 标记集。95 个 Class I 与 80 个 Class II 标记的比较证实,Class I 标记的多态性更高,因此更有用。