Scott D M, Humes L E
Division of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Jun;33(2):390-7.
Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were measured with three different psychoacoustical paradigms in the same normal-hearing subjects. In the temporal-probe method, the threshold of a 4-ms probe tone (frequencies of 1000 and 4000 Hz) was measured at various envelope phases within a 100% sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) noise at modulation frequencies from 2 to 256 Hz. For the derived-MTF method, the threshold of a 500-ms tone at 1000 and 4000 Hz was measured in the same noise at the same modulation frequencies. For the modulation-detection paradigm, modulation thresholds were measured as a function of modulation frequency for bandpass filtered SAM noise centered at 1000 and 4000 Hz. MTFs with lowpass shapes were observed with all three methods. Differences were observed in the cutoff frequencies and/or attenuation rates when the data were fitted with lowpass filter transfer functions. Factors influencing those differences are discussed.
在相同的听力正常受试者中,使用三种不同的心理声学范式测量调制传递函数(MTF)。在时间探测法中,在调制频率为2至256Hz的100%正弦幅度调制(SAM)噪声内,在不同包络相位下测量4ms探测音(频率为1000和4000Hz)的阈值。对于推导MTF法,在相同噪声和相同调制频率下测量1000和4000Hz的500ms纯音的阈值。对于调制检测范式,测量以1000和4000Hz为中心的带通滤波SAM噪声的调制阈值作为调制频率的函数。使用这三种方法均观察到具有低通形状的MTF。当数据用低通滤波器传递函数拟合时,在截止频率和/或衰减率方面观察到差异。讨论了影响这些差异的因素。