Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Dec;69(12):2622-34. doi: 10.1111/jan.12152. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
To discuss the definition of spirituality and its limitations for nursing research. It proposes a definition that will capture more accurately the role of spirituality in health outcomes.
Studies have increasingly examined spirituality in nursing research as a coping mechanism attenuating the negative impact of traumatic stress on mental health. Existing definitions of spirituality in nursing research include elements of positive emotional states (meaning, purpose, general well-being) which confound mental health outcomes.
Medline and CINAHL databases were searched from 2007-2011 for research articles examining spirituality definitions and measures used by nurse researchers.
An analysis of the definitions of spirituality in nursing research reveals inconsistencies and confounding mental health concepts. The authors propose defining spirituality in the context of religious involvement when conducting research, while using a broader definition of spirituality when providing spiritual care. They argue such definition provides a more appropriate method of measuring this concept in research aimed at evaluating mental health outcomes while preserving the currently used patient-defined definition of spirituality when providing spiritual care.
A consistent definition of spirituality in nursing research evaluating mental health outcomes, distinct from 'spiritual care' in a clinical setting, is essential to avoid tautological results that are meaningless. Appropriate definitions will enable nursing researchers to more clearly identify resilience mechanisms and improved health outcomes in those exposed to traumatic stress.
A definition of spirituality that focuses on religious involvement provides a more uniform and consistent measure for evaluating mental health outcomes in nursing research.
讨论灵性的定义及其在护理研究中的局限性。提出一个更准确捕捉灵性在健康结果中作用的定义。
随着研究越来越多地将灵性作为一种应对机制来减轻创伤性应激对心理健康的负面影响,护理研究中也越来越多地考察了灵性。护理研究中灵性的现有定义包括积极情绪状态(意义、目的、整体幸福感)的元素,这会混淆心理健康结果。
2007 年至 2011 年,在 Medline 和 CINAHL 数据库中搜索了考察护士研究人员使用的灵性定义和测量方法的研究文章。
对护理研究中灵性定义的分析揭示了不一致性和混淆心理健康概念。作者建议在进行研究时,根据宗教参与来定义灵性,而在提供灵性护理时使用更广泛的灵性定义。他们认为,这种定义为评估心理健康结果的研究提供了一种更合适的方法来衡量这一概念,同时在提供灵性护理时保留当前患者定义的灵性定义。
评估心理健康结果的护理研究中灵性的一致定义,与临床环境中的“灵性护理”不同,对于避免无意义的同义反复结果至关重要。适当的定义将使护理研究人员能够更清楚地识别暴露于创伤性应激下的弹性机制和改善的健康结果。
专注于宗教参与的灵性定义为评估护理研究中心理健康结果提供了更统一和一致的衡量标准。