• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠肝转移:肝门阻断在肝切除术中可降低部分患者肿瘤复发率。病例匹配分析。

Colorectal liver metastases: hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of tumor recurrence in selected patients. Case-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;39(7):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.015
PMID:23601983
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) during Liver Resection (LR) is a vascular procedure designed to prevent bleeding from the liver during hepatectomy. Outgrowth of pre-existing colorectal micrometastases may occur 5-6 times faster in occluded liver lobes than in non-occluded lobes. We conducted a case-matched analysis at our Institution to assess the effects of HPC on overall and recurrence-free survival in highly selected patients, who underwent LR due to Colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2010, 120 patients operated for CLM were included into this case-matched study. Patients were allocated to two groups: Group-A patients who underwent HPC during LR; Group-B patients who underwent LR without HPC.

RESULTS

HPC during liver resection was associated with better overall patient 5-year survival (47.2% in Group-A and 32.1% in Group-B) (P-value = 0.06), and significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival (49.9% in Group-A vs 18.3% in Group-B) (P-value = 0.010) The Cox regression model identified the following risk factors for worse prognosis in terms of shorter recurrence-free survival and higher incidence of tumor recurrence: no HPC (Group-B) (P-value = 0.032) and positive lymph nodes at the time of LR (P-value = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Lack of HPC in selected patients who underwent LR for CLM results to be a strong independent risk factor for higher patient exposure to tumor recurrence. We suggest that hepatic hilum clamping should be seriously taken into consideration in this patient setting.

MINI-ABSTRACT: A case-matched study was performed in 120 patients undergoing liver resection due to colorectal liver metastases, comparing patients who received intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) with those who did not. The 5-year overall survival rate was similar, but the 5-year recurrence-free rate was significantly higher with no HPC (p = 0.012).

摘要

背景

肝脏蒂夹闭(HPC)在肝切除术中是一种血管操作,旨在防止肝切除术中肝脏出血。在闭塞的肝叶中,预先存在的结直肠微转移的生长速度可能比非闭塞的肝叶快 5-6 倍。我们在本机构进行了一项病例匹配分析,以评估在高度选择的因结直肠肝转移(CLM)而行肝切除术的患者中,HPC 对总生存率和无复发生存率的影响。

材料和方法

从 2002 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月,共有 120 例因 CLM 接受手术的患者纳入本病例匹配研究。患者分为两组:A 组患者在肝切除术中行 HPC;B 组患者在肝切除术中不行 HPC。

结果

肝切除术中行 HPC 与更好的患者 5 年总生存率相关(A 组为 47.2%,B 组为 32.1%)(P 值=0.06),并显著改善了 5 年无复发生存率(A 组为 49.9%,B 组为 18.3%)(P 值=0.010)。Cox 回归模型确定了以下与无复发生存率较短和肿瘤复发率较高相关的预后不良的风险因素:无 HPC(B 组)(P 值=0.032)和 LR 时存在阳性淋巴结(P 值=0.018)。

结论

在因 CLM 而行肝切除术的患者中,缺乏 HPC 是患者面临更高肿瘤复发风险的一个独立危险因素。我们建议在这种患者情况下应认真考虑肝门阻断。

摘要

在 120 例因结直肠肝转移而行肝切除术的患者中进行了病例匹配研究,比较了接受间歇性肝蒂夹闭(HPC)的患者和未接受 HPC 的患者。5 年总生存率相似,但无 HPC 组的 5 年无复发生存率显著提高(P=0.012)。

相似文献

1
Colorectal liver metastases: hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy reduces the incidence of tumor recurrence in selected patients. Case-matched analysis.结直肠肝转移:肝门阻断在肝切除术中可降低部分患者肿瘤复发率。病例匹配分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;39(7):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
2
Hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: no impact on survival or hepatic recurrence.肝门阻断在结直肠癌肝转移切除术中的应用:对生存及肝内复发无影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;20(1):285-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2583-0. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
3
Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: present surgical approach.结直肠癌肝转移:当前的手术治疗方法
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Nov-Dec;50(54):2067-71.
4
Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: resection determines outcome.孤立性结直肠癌肝转移:手术切除决定预后。
Arch Surg. 2006 May;141(5):460-6; discussion 466-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.460.
5
Influence of surgical margin on type of recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: a single-center experience.手术切缘对结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术后复发类型的影响:单中心经验
Surgery. 2008 Mar;143(3):384-93. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.038. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
6
Surgical treatment for extrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal metastases.结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术后肝外复发的外科治疗。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Nov-Dec;51(60):1805-9.
7
[Recurrent colorectal liver metastases: who benefits from a second hepatic resection?].[复发性结直肠癌肝转移:谁能从二次肝切除中获益?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Apr;139(2):226-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328565. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Role of the surgeon as a variable in long-term survival after liver resection for colorectal metastases.外科医生作为结直肠癌肝转移切除术后长期生存的一个变量的作用。
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;100(7):538-45. doi: 10.1002/jso.21393.
9
Hepatic resection with reconstruction of the inferior vena cava or hepatic venous confluence for metastatic liver tumor from colorectal cancer.用于治疗结直肠癌肝转移瘤的肝切除术联合下腔静脉或肝静脉汇合部重建术
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Mar;198(3):366-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.004.
10
The pre-operative rate of growth of colorectal metastases in patients selected for liver resection does not influence post-operative disease-free survival.入选肝切除手术的患者,其结直肠转移瘤术前的生长速率并不影响术后无病生存期。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;42(3):426-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Pringle maneuver on prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after liver resection: a meta-analysis.肝门阻断对结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后预后的影响:一项Meta分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 6;409(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03248-5.
2
Long-Term Effects of Pedicle Clamping during Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.结直肠癌肝转移大肝切除术中肾蒂阻断的长期影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 24;10(13):2778. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132778.
3
Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection.
普林格尔手法对肝切除术后长期肿瘤学结局影响的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):3279. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82291-4.
4
Impact of Intermittent Pringle Maneuver on Long-Term Survival After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Result from Two Combined Randomized Controlled Trials.间歇阻断肝门法对肝细胞癌肝切除术后长期生存的影响:两项联合随机对照试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):3101-3109. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05130-8.
5
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study Using a Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配的对比研究
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):615-625. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4827-z.
6
Prognostic Factors Affecting Long-Term Survival after Resection for Noncolorectal, Nonneuroendocrine, and Nonsarcoma Liver Metastases.影响非结直肠癌、非神经内分泌和非肉瘤肝转移瘤切除术后长期生存的预后因素。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:5184146. doi: 10.1155/2017/5184146. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Short-term and middle-term evaluation of laparoscopic hepatectomies compared with open hepatectomies: A propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的短期和中期评估:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Sep 27;8(9):643-650. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i9.643.
8
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparative study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:倾向评分匹配的比较研究
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Aug;5(4):290-9. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2015.12.06.
9
Proper hepatic pedicle clamping during hepatectomy is associated with improved postoperative long-term prognosis in patients with AJCC stage IIIB hepatocellular carcinoma.肝切除术中适当的肝蒂阻断与美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC) IIIB期肝细胞癌患者术后长期预后改善相关。
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 26;7(17):24623-32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8331.
10
Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is it Worth the Challenge?复发性结直肠癌肝转移的再次肝切除术:是否值得挑战?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec;19(12):2192-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2939-4. Epub 2015 Sep 11.