Suppr超能文献

经典与反转镫骨撼动术采用 CO2 激光完成:对比分析。

Classic and reversal steps stapedotomy performed with CO2 laser: a comparative analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Policlinico Universitario, Via Consolare Valeria, 98100, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;271(5):981-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2500-6. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate and compare hearing outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative complications and tinnitus characteristics, with particular regard to the effects of stapes surgery on the course of tinnitus. Two groups were evaluated: one group of patients were treated with classical stapedotomy and the second group was composed of patients who underwent reversal technique. Eighty-four patients aged between 22 and 62 years with otosclerosis were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 49, 17 male, mean age 38, patients treated with classic stapedotomy) and group 2 (n = 35, 13 male, mean age 40, patients treated with reversal stapedotomy). Classical and reversal stapedotomy techniques were performed using CO2 laser; self-crimping titanium piston prosthesis were positioned in patients treated with reversal stapedotomy and classical stapedotomy. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation using pure tone audiometry (air-bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds and air-conduction thresholds). Tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) scale and intraoperative/postoperative complications were assessed in both groups. Wilcoxon's test and Friedman's test followed by post hoc analysis were used. There were no statistically significant differences in ABG, air conduction, bone conduction, and THI score variations after surgery between the two groups. Complications in both groups were not significant, and different. In conclusion, reversal and classic stapedotomies performed with CO2 laser can be considered efficient, safe and reliable techniques considering the hearing outcomes and complications recorded.

摘要

本文旨在评估和比较听力结果、术中及术后并发症和耳鸣特征,特别关注镫骨手术对耳鸣病程的影响。评估了两组患者:一组患者接受经典镫骨切开术治疗,另一组患者接受反转技术治疗。84 名年龄在 22 岁至 62 岁之间的耳硬化症患者分为两组:第 1 组(n=49,17 名男性,平均年龄 38 岁,接受经典镫骨切开术治疗)和第 2 组(n=35,13 名男性,平均年龄 40 岁,接受反转镫骨切开术治疗)。使用 CO2 激光进行经典和反转镫骨切开术;反转镫骨切开术组患者使用自卷曲钛活塞假体定位,经典镫骨切开术组患者使用常规活塞假体定位。使用纯音听力测试(气骨导差(ABG)、骨导阈值和气导阈值)进行术前和术后听力评估。在两组中评估耳鸣残疾量表(THI)评分和术中/术后并发症。使用 Wilcoxon 检验和 Friedman 检验,然后进行事后分析。两组术后 ABG、气导、骨导和 THI 评分变化无统计学差异。两组的并发症均不显著且不同。总之,使用 CO2 激光进行反转和经典镫骨切开术可以被认为是有效、安全和可靠的技术,考虑到记录的听力结果和并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验