Couture Jodianne, Létourneau Anne, Dubuc Annie, Williamson David
, BPharm, MSc, is a Pharmacist in the Pharmacy Department, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Hôpital Fleurimont, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2013 Mar;66(2):96-103. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v66i2.1231.
Implementation of electrolyte repletion protocols to facilitate and ensure the safety of electrolyte control is common practice in intensive care units (ICUs). However, few protocols have been evaluated and validated.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an electrolyte repletion protocol in a large, homogeneous group of postoperative patients.
A retrospective study of patients admitted to the surgical ICU following coronary artery bypass grafting or heart valve replacement was undertaken at the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, a 682-bed tertiary care hospital in Sherbrooke, Quebec. The proportion of measured values for serum potassium concentration that were within the desired range was compared between patients treated according to the electrolyte repletion protocol and those treated with the traditional approach to electrolyte repletion. Management of magnesium, phosphorus, and ionized calcium balance was also compared. The incidence of cardiac arrhythmias was documented, and the safety of the electrolyte repletion protocol was evaluated by determining and comparing proportions of values for serum electrolyte concentration that were above the desired range.
In total, 627 patients were included in the study: 312 in the control group and 315 in the protocol group. The proportion of patients with 100% of morning values for serum potassium concentration within the normal range was significantly higher in the protocol group than in the control group (66.1% versus 56.8%; p = 0.018). In the protocol group, significantly more patients received one or more replacement doses of magnesium and phosphorus (p < 0.001). The proportions of serum electrolyte values above the normal range were similar between the 2 groups, and there was no difference in the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias.
The electrolyte repletion protocol was more efficacious than traditional electrolyte repletion in maintaining normal serum potassium concentration and was safe.
实施电解质补充方案以促进并确保电解质控制的安全性是重症监护病房(ICU)的常见做法。然而,很少有方案经过评估和验证。
评估一种电解质补充方案在一大组同质化术后患者中的有效性和安全性。
在魁北克省舍布鲁克市一家拥有682张床位的三级护理医院——舍布鲁克大学中心医院,对冠状动脉搭桥术或心脏瓣膜置换术后入住外科ICU的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。比较了根据电解质补充方案治疗的患者和采用传统电解质补充方法治疗的患者血清钾浓度测量值在期望范围内的比例。还比较了镁、磷和离子钙平衡的管理情况。记录心律失常的发生率,并通过确定和比较血清电解质浓度值高于期望范围的比例来评估电解质补充方案的安全性。
该研究共纳入627例患者:对照组312例,方案组315例。方案组血清钾浓度早晨值100%在正常范围内的患者比例显著高于对照组(66.1%对56.8%;p = 0.018)。在方案组中,接受一剂或多剂镁和磷补充的患者明显更多(p < 0.001)。两组血清电解质值高于正常范围的比例相似,心律失常的发生率也没有差异。
在维持正常血清钾浓度方面,电解质补充方案比传统电解质补充更有效且安全。