Sedigh A, Tufveson G, Bäckman L, Biglarnia A-R, Lorant T
Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Transplantation Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Transplant Proc. 2013 Apr;45(3):1168-71. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.017.
Simple cold storage (CS) is the gold standard for organ preservation. Recently, evidence has been presented suggesting compared with CS hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) improves the quality and outcome of kidneys for transplantation. Uppsala has used the LifePort Kidney Transporter to preserve deceased donor kidneys. We evaluated our first single-center 52 cases retrospectively.
Deceased donor kidneys preserved with HMP between July 2010 and July 2012 (n = 52) were compared with a matched historical cohort of organs preserved by CS between January 2009 and July 2012 (n = 87). We evaluated delayed graft function (DGF), creatinine level at hospital discharge, length of hospital stay, incidence of acute rejection episodes during the first year after transplantation, and graft survival.
Both groups included approximately 69% expanded criteria donors (ECD). Median cold ischemia time (CIT) was 12.8 hours in the HMP group and 11.7 hours in the CS group. The incidence of DGF was 11.5% with HMP and 20.7% with CS. Compared with CS, HMP significantly reduced the occurrence of DGF from 21.4% to 0% using standard criteria kidneys (P = .046), whereas the use of HMP did not impact the occurrence of DGF with ECD kidneys. The creatinine level at hospital discharge was lower after HMP than after CS (P = .047). No difference in graft survival was observed between the groups.
Machine perfusion resulted in a lower occurrence of DGF using kidneys from standard criteria donors with a lower creatinine at hospital discharge among the cohort with reasonably low CIT. Using machine perfusion seems to be safe; no adverse surgical events occurred during the study period.
单纯冷藏(CS)是器官保存的金标准。最近,有证据表明,与CS相比,低温机器灌注(HMP)可提高移植肾的质量和移植效果。乌普萨拉使用LifePort肾脏转运器来保存已故供体的肾脏。我们对首例单中心52例病例进行了回顾性评估。
将2010年7月至2012年7月期间用HMP保存的已故供体肾脏(n = 52)与2009年1月至2012年7月期间用CS保存的匹配历史队列器官(n = 87)进行比较。我们评估了移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)、出院时的肌酐水平、住院时间、移植后第一年急性排斥反应的发生率以及移植肾存活情况。
两组中约69%为扩大标准供体(ECD)。HMP组的中位冷缺血时间(CIT)为12.8小时,CS组为11.7小时。HMP组的DGF发生率为11.5%,CS组为20.7%。与CS相比,HMP显著降低了标准标准肾脏的DGF发生率,从21.4%降至0%(P = 0.046),而使用HMP对ECD肾脏的DGF发生率没有影响。HMP后出院时的肌酐水平低于CS后(P = 0.047)。两组之间在移植肾存活方面未观察到差异。
在CIT相对较低的队列中,机器灌注导致标准标准供体肾脏的DGF发生率较低,出院时肌酐水平较低。使用机器灌注似乎是安全的;在研究期间未发生不良手术事件。