文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

从美国管理式医疗角度看起始用瑞舒伐他汀治疗高危血脂异常患者的预算影响。

Budget impact of rosuvastatin initiation in high-risk hyperlipidemic patients from a US managed care perspective.

机构信息

Medaxial Group, London, K.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):907-16. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.801350. Epub 2013 May 23.


DOI:10.3111/13696998.2013.801350
PMID:23641809
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, which, when elevated, represent a significant risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Hyperlipidemic patients at risk of CV events initiated on simvastatin or atorvastatin may be less likely to meet LDL-C goals (defined in National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines) and more likely to experience CV events than patients initiated on rosuvastatin. A 3-year budget impact model was developed to estimate the clinical impact and cost to a US managed care organization (MCO) with 1 million members of initiating high-risk hyperlipidemic patients on rosuvastatin rather than simvastatin or atorvastatin. METHODS: A total of 1000 adult patients were assumed to initiate statins. The average baseline LDL-C level was 189 mg/dL. In scenario 1, all patients were initiated on simvastatin or atorvastatin and titrated to a higher dose, or switched to atorvastatin (if initiated on simvastatin) or rosuvastatin; in scenario 2, 50% of the 520 high-risk patients were initiated on rosuvastatin. Drug acquisition and administration costs were considered. Product labeling, clinical trial results, national prescription claims data, and published literature were used to populate the model. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 75 additional patients reached their LDL-C goal in scenario 2, compared with scenario 1 (633 vs 558, respectively), at an increased cost of $240,628 ($1,415,516 vs $1,174,888, respectively). The additional per member per month (PMPM) cost of scenario 2 was $0.007. LIMITATIONS: This analysis assumed that statin efficacy is the same in real life as in trials, and used titration and switching patterns not based on patients' goal attainment. However, sensitivity and scenario analyses showed that the model was less sensitive to these parameters than to cost-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating high-risk hyperlipidemic patients on rosuvastatin may increase the number of patients reaching LDL-C goal at a relatively modest increase in PMPM cost to an MCO.

摘要

简介:他汀类药物可降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平,当 LDL-C 水平升高时,它是心血管(CV)疾病的一个重要危险因素。与起始用瑞舒伐他汀的患者相比,起始用辛伐他汀或阿托伐他汀的发生 CV 事件风险高的血脂异常患者更可能无法达到 LDL-C 目标(根据国家胆固醇教育计划指南定义),并且更可能发生 CV 事件。建立了一个 3 年预算影响模型,以评估对于拥有 100 万成员的美国管理式医疗组织(MCO)而言,起始用高风险血脂异常患者用瑞舒伐他汀而非辛伐他汀或阿托伐他汀的临床影响和成本。 方法:假设共有 1000 例成年患者起始用他汀类药物。平均基线 LDL-C 水平为 189mg/dL。在方案 1 中,所有患者起始用辛伐他汀或阿托伐他汀,并滴定至更高剂量,或换用阿托伐他汀(如果起始用辛伐他汀)或瑞舒伐他汀;在方案 2 中,520 例高危患者中的 50%起始用瑞舒伐他汀。考虑了药物获取和管理成本。使用产品标签、临床试验结果、全国处方索赔数据和已发表的文献来填充模型。 结果:在 3 年内,方案 2 中有 75 例患者达到 LDL-C 目标,而方案 1 中为 633 例(分别为 75 例和 633 例),成本增加 240628 美元(分别为 1174888 美元和 1415516 美元)。方案 2 的每名成员每月额外成本为 0.007 美元。 局限性:该分析假设他汀类药物的疗效在现实生活中与临床试验中相同,并且使用了不基于患者目标实现的滴定和转换模式。但是,敏感性和方案分析表明,该模型对这些参数的敏感性低于对成本相关参数的敏感性。 结论:起始用高风险血脂异常患者用瑞舒伐他汀可能会增加达到 LDL-C 目标的患者数量,而管理式医疗组织的每名成员每月的成本仅略有增加。

相似文献

[1]
Budget impact of rosuvastatin initiation in high-risk hyperlipidemic patients from a US managed care perspective.

J Med Econ. 2013-5-23

[2]
Rosuvastatin is cost-effective in treating patients to low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol goals compared with atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin: analysis of the STELLAR trial.

Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005-2

[3]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin from a Canadian health system perspective.

Clin Ther. 2008-7

[4]
Rosuvastatin is cost-effective compared with atorvastatin in reaching cholesterol goals.

Int J Cardiol. 2005-10-10

[5]
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and LDL-C goal attainment among elderly patients treated with rosuvastatin compared with other statins in routine clinical practice.

Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007-9

[6]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin among high-risk patients in usual clinical practice.

Am J Manag Care. 2006-11

[7]
Cost effectiveness of rosuvastatin in treating patients to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals compared with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin (a US Analysis of the STELLAR Trial).

Am J Cardiol. 2005-6-1

[8]
Cost-effectiveness of statins in the prevention of coronary heart disease events in middle-aged Finnish men.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2008-6

[9]
Cholesterol level goal attainment with statins: clinical management guideline recommendations versus management in actual clinical practice.

Pharmacotherapy. 2012-7

[10]
Lipid levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in diabetic patients: rosuvastatin compared with other statins in usual care.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Pharmacoeconomics of PCSK9 inhibitors in 103 hypercholesterolemic patients referred for diagnosis and treatment to a cholesterol treatment center.

Lipids Health Dis. 2016-8-18

[2]
A Methodological Review of US Budget-Impact Models for New Drugs.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2016-11

[3]
Financial Analysis of CYP2C19 Genotyping in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索