Vezina P, Stewart J
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Qué., Canada.
Brain Res. 1990 May 14;516(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90902-n.
Different groups of rats received conditioning training with bilateral injections of amphetamine (2.5 micrograms/0.5 microliters/side) either into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or the nucleus accumbens (NAC) and were tested on separate occasions for conditioned locomotor activity with saline and cross-sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of morphine (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.). Intra-VTA injections of amphetamine had no effect acutely but subsequently produced a sensitized locomotor response to morphine. On the other hand, intra-NAC amphetamine produced increased locomotion but with no evidence of sensitization either during training or on the test with morphine. No evidence for conditioning of the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine or for stimulus control of the expression of the sensitized response to morphine was obtained with either the intra-VTA or the intra-NAC injections. These results confirm earlier findings indicating that the site of action of amphetamine critical for the development of behavioral sensitization is the VTA and not the NAC and extend them to the case of cross-sensitization to morphine. They also demonstrate that behavioral sensitization can be obtained in the absence of conditioned effects and, therefore, that the two phenomena are distinct. Implications of the present findings for an understanding of the mode and site of action of amphetamine in the development of conditioned locomotor activity are discussed.
不同组的大鼠接受了条件性训练,通过向腹侧被盖区(VTA)或伏隔核(NAC)双侧注射苯丙胺(2.5微克/0.5微升/侧),并在不同时间分别用生理盐水测试条件性运动活动,以及对吗啡(1.0毫克/千克,腹腔注射)的运动激活作用进行交叉致敏测试。向VTA内注射苯丙胺急性时没有效果,但随后对吗啡产生了致敏的运动反应。另一方面,向NAC内注射苯丙胺会使运动增加,但在训练期间或用吗啡测试时均没有致敏的证据。无论是向VTA内还是向NAC内注射,均未获得苯丙胺运动激活作用的条件化证据,也未获得对吗啡致敏反应表达的刺激控制证据。这些结果证实了早期的发现,即对行为致敏发展至关重要 的苯丙胺作用部位是VTA而非NAC,并将其扩展到对吗啡的交叉致敏情况。它们还表明,在没有条件性效应的情况下也可获得行为致敏,因此,这两种现象是不同的。本文讨论了这些发现对理解苯丙胺在条件性运动活动发展中的作用方式和作用部位的意义。