Suppr超能文献

向腹侧被盖区而非伏隔核注射苯丙胺会使大鼠对全身注射吗啡敏感:缺乏条件性效应。

Amphetamine administered to the ventral tegmental area but not to the nucleus accumbens sensitizes rats to systemic morphine: lack of conditioned effects.

作者信息

Vezina P, Stewart J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Qué., Canada.

出版信息

Brain Res. 1990 May 14;516(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90902-n.

Abstract

Different groups of rats received conditioning training with bilateral injections of amphetamine (2.5 micrograms/0.5 microliters/side) either into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or the nucleus accumbens (NAC) and were tested on separate occasions for conditioned locomotor activity with saline and cross-sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of morphine (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.). Intra-VTA injections of amphetamine had no effect acutely but subsequently produced a sensitized locomotor response to morphine. On the other hand, intra-NAC amphetamine produced increased locomotion but with no evidence of sensitization either during training or on the test with morphine. No evidence for conditioning of the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine or for stimulus control of the expression of the sensitized response to morphine was obtained with either the intra-VTA or the intra-NAC injections. These results confirm earlier findings indicating that the site of action of amphetamine critical for the development of behavioral sensitization is the VTA and not the NAC and extend them to the case of cross-sensitization to morphine. They also demonstrate that behavioral sensitization can be obtained in the absence of conditioned effects and, therefore, that the two phenomena are distinct. Implications of the present findings for an understanding of the mode and site of action of amphetamine in the development of conditioned locomotor activity are discussed.

摘要

不同组的大鼠接受了条件性训练,通过向腹侧被盖区(VTA)或伏隔核(NAC)双侧注射苯丙胺(2.5微克/0.5微升/侧),并在不同时间分别用生理盐水测试条件性运动活动,以及对吗啡(1.0毫克/千克,腹腔注射)的运动激活作用进行交叉致敏测试。向VTA内注射苯丙胺急性时没有效果,但随后对吗啡产生了致敏的运动反应。另一方面,向NAC内注射苯丙胺会使运动增加,但在训练期间或用吗啡测试时均没有致敏的证据。无论是向VTA内还是向NAC内注射,均未获得苯丙胺运动激活作用的条件化证据,也未获得对吗啡致敏反应表达的刺激控制证据。这些结果证实了早期的发现,即对行为致敏发展至关重要 的苯丙胺作用部位是VTA而非NAC,并将其扩展到对吗啡的交叉致敏情况。它们还表明,在没有条件性效应的情况下也可获得行为致敏,因此,这两种现象是不同的。本文讨论了这些发现对理解苯丙胺在条件性运动活动发展中的作用方式和作用部位的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验