Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem , NC, USA.
Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Dec 12;3(4):475-87. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-06-RA-0022. Print 2012.
Scant knowledge exists describing health care providers' and staffs' experiences sharing imaging studies. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which imaging studies are shared in diverse health care settings, and the extent to which provider or practice characteristics are associated with barriers to viewing external imaging studies on portable media.
This analysis uses qualitative data to 1) examine how providers and their staff accessed outside medical imaging studies, 2) examine whether use or the desire to use imaging studies conducted at outside facilities varied by provider specialty or location (urban, suburban, and small town) and 3) delineate difficulties experienced by providers or staff as they attempted to view and use imaging studies available on portable media.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 85 health care providers and medical facility staff from urban, suburban, and small town medical practices in North Carolina and Virginia. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, then systematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti.
Physicians at family and pediatric medicine practices rely primarily on written reports for medical studies other than X-rays; and thus do not report difficulties accessing outside imaging studies. Subspecialists in urban, suburban, and small towns view imaging studies through internal communication systems, internet portals, or portable media. Many subspecialists and their staff report experiencing difficulty and time delays in accessing and using imaging studies on portable media.
Subspecialists have distinct needs for viewing imaging studies that are not shared by typical primary care providers. As development and implementation of technical strategies to share medical records continue, this variation in need and use should be noted. The sharing and viewing of medical imaging studies on portable media is often inefficient and fails to meet the needs of many subspeciality physicians, and can lead to repeated imaging studies.
关于医疗服务提供者和工作人员分享影像研究的经验,相关知识非常有限。需要进一步研究,以确定在不同的医疗保健环境中,影像研究的共享程度,以及提供者或实践特征与使用外部便携式媒体查看影像研究的障碍之间的关联程度。
本分析使用定性数据:1)检查提供者及其工作人员如何访问外部医学影像研究;2)检查使用或希望使用来自外部医疗机构的影像研究的情况是否因提供者的专业或地点(城市、郊区和小镇)而异;3)描绘提供者或工作人员在尝试查看和使用便携式媒体上可用的影像研究时所经历的困难。
在北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州的城市、郊区和小镇医疗实践中,对 85 名医疗保健提供者和医疗机构工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。访谈进行了录音,并进行了转录,然后使用 ATLAS.ti 系统进行了系统分析。
家庭和儿科医学实践中的医生主要依赖于书面报告来获取除 X 光以外的其他医学研究报告;因此,他们不会报告在获取外部影像研究方面的困难。城市、郊区和小镇的专科医生通过内部沟通系统、互联网门户或便携式媒体查看影像研究。许多专科医生及其工作人员报告说,在使用便携式媒体访问和使用影像研究方面存在困难和时间延迟。
专科医生在查看影像研究方面有独特的需求,这与一般的初级保健提供者不同。随着开发和实施用于共享病历的技术策略的继续,应注意到这种需求和使用的差异。在便携式媒体上共享和查看医学影像研究通常效率低下,无法满足许多专科医生的需求,并可能导致重复成像研究。