Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Westzeedijk 361, Postbus 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Aug;133(8):1079-87. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1763-0. Epub 2013 May 7.
Both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in children can be stabilised without cast by a flexible intramedullary nail in both the radius and the ulna. Adequate results with single-bone fixation combined with a complementary cast are also reported. However, because those results are based on a selection of children, this trial investigates whether single-bone intramedullary fixation, compared with both-bone intramedullary fixation, results in similar pronation and supination in children with an unstable diaphyseal both-bone forearm fracture.
In four Dutch hospitals, 24 consecutive children aged <16 years with a displaced unstable both-bone diaphyseal forearm fracture were randomly allocated to single-bone or both-bone intramedullary fixation. Primary outcome was limitation of pronation and supination 9 months after initial trauma. Secondary outcomes were limitation of flexion/extension of wrist/elbow, complication rate, operation time, cosmetics of the fractured arm, complaints in daily life, and assessment of radiographs.
Between January 2006 and August 2010, 11 children were randomised to single-bone fixation and 13 to both-bone fixation. In the both-bone fixation group, two fractures were stabilized by only one nail. In both groups, median limitation of pronation/supination at 9-month follow-up was 5°-10°. In both groups operation time was similar but in the single-bone fixation group cast immobilisation was longer (median of 37 vs. 28 days). In four children, re-displacement of the fracture occurred in those fractures without an intramedullary nail.
These results caution against the use of single-bone fixation in all both-bone forearm fractures. This method may lead to increased re-displacement and reduced clinical results.
儿童双骨干前臂骨折可通过桡骨和尺骨干内置弹性髓内钉固定而无需石膏固定。也有报道称,单骨干固定结合补充石膏固定可获得满意的结果。然而,由于这些结果是基于对部分儿童的选择,因此本试验研究了单骨干髓内固定与双骨干髓内固定相比,是否会导致不稳定双骨干前臂骨折儿童的旋前和旋后功能相似。
在荷兰的四家医院,连续纳入了 24 名年龄<16 岁的移位不稳定双骨干前臂骨折的儿童,将他们随机分配到单骨干或双骨干髓内固定组。主要结局是初始创伤后 9 个月时旋前和旋后受限的程度。次要结局是腕关节/肘关节屈伸受限、并发症发生率、手术时间、骨折手臂的美容效果、日常生活中的抱怨以及 X 线评估。
2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 8 月,11 名儿童被随机分配到单骨干固定组,13 名儿童被随机分配到双骨干固定组。在双骨干固定组中,有两例骨折仅用一根钉固定。两组的旋前/旋后受限的中位数在 9 个月的随访时均为 5°-10°。两组的手术时间相似,但单骨干固定组的石膏固定时间较长(中位数为 37 天比 28 天)。在 4 名儿童中,未使用髓内钉的骨折出现了再移位。
这些结果提醒我们不要在所有双骨干前臂骨折中使用单骨干固定。这种方法可能会导致骨折再移位和临床结果下降。