Maggiulli Federica, Hay Norman, Mars Michael, Worrell Emma, Green James, Sommerlad Brian
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Jan;51(1):43-8. doi: 10.1597/11-297. Epub 2013 May 7.
Comparison of the effects of vomerine flap (VF) closure of the hard palate at the time of lip repair with non-closure of the hard palate in subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
Retrospective, single-blinded, cohort study.
Study model sets of 40 consecutive, non-syndromic, infants with complete UCLP operated on between 1988 and 1998.
All subjects were operated on by a single consultant plastic surgeon immediately before and after the unit's change of protocol (1993), when VF closure of the hard palate was incorporated at the time of lip repair. Subjects were divided into two groups: VF ( n = 18) and non-VF (n = 22), which acted as a control group. Each subject had maxillary impressions taken before lip repair at 3 months (VF mean age = 11.7 weeks; non-VF mean age = 13.4 weeks) and before palate repair at 6 months (VF mean age = 22.8 weeks; non-VF mean age = 24.0 weeks).
Seven predetermined landmarks and four maxillary dimensions were computed following single-blinded analysis using a reflex microscope.
Repeatability tests showed good measurement precision. The operator measurement errors were 0.00018 mm in a horizontal plane (X and Y) and 0.00028 in the vertical plane (Z). The VF group showed significant changes in the alveolar cleft width. There were no statistically significant changes in any arch-form variable between the VF and non-VF groups.
The decrease of alveolar arch gap width at palate repair (6 months) in the VF group was significantly more than the decrease observed in the non-VF group, and there was no significant decrease in the, anterior and posterior arch width or anteroposterior length of the hard palate in the VF group compared with the non-VF group.
比较在单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者唇修复时采用犁骨瓣(VF)关闭硬腭与不关闭硬腭的效果。
回顾性、单盲队列研究。
研究模型为1988年至1998年间连续40例非综合征性完全性UCLP婴儿的手术病例。
所有患者均由同一位整形外科顾问医生手术,手术时间为该科室方案变更前后(1993年),此时唇修复时采用VF关闭硬腭。患者分为两组:VF组(n = 18)和非VF组(n = 22),后者作为对照组。每组患者在3个月唇修复前(VF组平均年龄 = 11.7周;非VF组平均年龄 = 13.4周)以及6个月腭裂修复前(VF组平均年龄 = 22.8周;非VF组平均年龄 = 24.0周)均进行上颌印模制取。
使用反光显微镜进行单盲分析后,计算7个预定标志点和4个上颌尺寸。
重复性测试显示测量精度良好。操作者在水平面(X和Y)的测量误差为0.00018毫米,在垂直面(Z)为0.00028毫米。VF组牙槽裂宽度有显著变化。VF组和非VF组之间任何牙弓形态变量均无统计学显著变化。
VF组在腭裂修复时(6个月)牙槽弓间隙宽度的减小明显大于非VF组,且与非VF组相比,VF组硬腭的前后弓宽度或前后长度无显著减小。