Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, PO Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2459-68. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2840-z. Epub 2013 May 8.
In low-resource settings, limitations in diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays (CXR) for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) relate partly to non-expert interpretation. We piloted a TB CXR Image Reference Set (TIRS) to improve non-expert performance in an operational setting in Malawi.
Nineteen doctors and clinical officers read 60 CXR of patients with suspected PTB, at baseline and using TIRS. Two officers also used the CXR Reading and Recording System (CRRS). Correct treatment decisions were assessed against a "gold standard" of mycobacterial culture and expert performance.
TIRS significantly increased overall non-expert sensitivity from 67.6 (SD 14.9) to 75.5 (SD 11.1, P = 0.013), approaching expert values of 84.2 (SD 5.2). Among doctors, correct decisions increased from 60.7 % (SD 7.9) to 67.1 % (SD 8.0, P = 0.054). Clinical officers increased in sensitivity from 68.0 % (SD 15) to 77.4 % (SD 10.7, P = 0.056), but decreased in specificity from 55.0 % (SD 23.9) to 40.8 % (SD 10.4, P = 0.049). Two officers made correct treatment decisions with TIRS in 62.7 %. CRRS training increased this to 67.8 %.
Use of a CXR image reference set increased correct decisions by doctors to treat PTB. This tool may provide a low-cost intervention improving non-expert performance, translating into improved clinical care. Further evaluation is warranted.
• Tuberculosis treatment decisions are influenced by CXR findings, despite improved laboratory diagnostics. • In low-resource settings, CXR interpretation is performed largely by non-experts. • We piloted the effect of a simple reference training set of CXRs. • Use of the reference set increased the number of correct treatment decisions. This effect was more marked for doctors than clinical officers. • Further evaluation of this simple training tool is warranted.
在资源匮乏的环境下,胸部 X 光(CXR)对肺结核(PTB)的诊断准确性有限,部分原因是解释者缺乏专业性。我们在马拉维的一个运营环境中试用了肺结核 CXR 图像参考集(TIRS),以提高非专业人员的表现。
19 名医生和临床医生在基线时和使用 TIRS 时阅读了 60 例疑似肺结核患者的 CXR。两名官员还使用了 CXR 阅读和记录系统(CRRS)。根据分枝杆菌培养和专家表现的“金标准”评估正确的治疗决策。
TIRS 显著提高了整体非专业人员的敏感性,从 67.6(SD 14.9)提高到 75.5(SD 11.1,P=0.013),接近专家的 84.2(SD 5.2)。在医生中,正确的决策从 60.7%(SD 7.9)提高到 67.1%(SD 8.0,P=0.054)。临床医生的敏感性从 68.0%(SD 15)提高到 77.4%(SD 10.7,P=0.056),但特异性从 55.0%(SD 23.9)降低到 40.8%(SD 10.4,P=0.049)。两名官员使用 TIRS 做出了 62.7%的正确治疗决策。CRRS 培训将这一比例提高到 67.8%。
使用 CXR 图像参考集增加了医生治疗肺结核的正确决策。该工具可能提供一种低成本的干预措施,提高非专业人员的表现,从而改善临床护理。需要进一步评估。
尽管实验室诊断有所改善,但肺结核的治疗决策仍受 CXR 结果的影响。
在资源匮乏的环境下,CXR 解释主要由非专业人员进行。
我们试用了简单的 CXR 参考培训集的效果。
使用参考集增加了正确治疗决策的数量。这种效果在医生中比在临床医生中更为明显。
这种简单的培训工具需要进一步评估。