Bilbao Ares A, Sabaté A, Porteiro L, Ibáñez B, Koo M, Pi A
Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2013 Aug-Sep;60(7):384-91. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2013.02.016. Epub 2013 May 6.
The incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms after performing interscalene block varies between 4 and 16%. The majority of cases are resolved spontaneously within a year, but some patients have their symptoms permanently. Our objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms after performing the ultrasound-assisted interscalene and supraclavicular anaesthetic blocks.
A prospective and observational study was conducted on consecutive patients who had undergone upper extremity surgery with an interscalene or supraclavicular block as an isolated technique, or as a complement to general anaesthesia. Seven days after the intervention, a telephone interview was conducted that focused on the detection of neurological symptoms in the operated limb. Further serial interviews were conducted on patients with symptoms (after the first, the third and the sixth month, and one year after surgery) until resolution of symptoms. Neurological evaluation was offered to those patients with persistent symptoms after one year.
A total of 121 patients were included, on whom 96 interscalene blocks and 22 supraclavicular blocks were performed. Postoperative neurological symptoms were detected in 9.9% (95% CI, 5-15%) of patients during the first week. No significant differences were observed between interscalene (9%) and supraclavicular block (14%). After 3 months the symptoms persisted in 9 patients (7.4%), with symptoms remaining in 4 patients (3.3%) after 1.5 years. Electromyogram was performed on 3 patients who tested positive for nerve damage.
A high incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms was observed, and a worrying percentage of permanence of them. There were no significant differences in incidence according to the type of block, or any features of the patient or the anaesthesia technique that were associated with the incidence of these symptoms, except a marginal relationship with age. These complications must be clearly explained to the patients before performing these blocks.
肌间沟阻滞术后神经症状的发生率在4%至16%之间。大多数病例在一年内可自发缓解,但部分患者症状会持续存在。我们的目的是评估超声引导下肌间沟和锁骨上麻醉阻滞术后神经症状的发生率。
对连续接受上肢手术且采用肌间沟或锁骨上阻滞作为单一技术或作为全身麻醉补充的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。干预7天后进行电话访谈,重点关注手术肢体神经症状的检测。对有症状的患者(术后第1个月、第3个月、第6个月和1年后)进行进一步的系列访谈,直至症状缓解。对术后1年仍有持续症状的患者进行神经学评估。
共纳入121例患者,其中实施了96次肌间沟阻滞和22次锁骨上阻滞。术后第一周,9.9%(95%可信区间,5%-15%)的患者出现神经症状。肌间沟阻滞组(9%)和锁骨上阻滞组(14%)之间未观察到显著差异。3个月后,9例患者(7.4%)症状持续存在,1.5年后仍有4例患者(3.3%)有症状。对3例神经损伤检测呈阳性的患者进行了肌电图检查。
观察到术后神经症状的发生率较高,且令人担忧的是其中有一定比例的症状会持续存在。根据阻滞类型、患者的任何特征或麻醉技术,这些症状的发生率均无显著差异,但与年龄存在微弱关联。在进行这些阻滞之前,必须向患者清楚解释这些并发症。