Hujoel P P, Loesche W J, DeRouen T A
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
J Periodontol. 1990 Jun;61(6):368-72. doi: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.6.368.
The assessment of relationships between site-specific variables has been a matter of controversy because of the claim that periodontal sites within individuals can be used as independent observations in statistical models. One problem with this approach is the unreliability of the calculated Type I and Type II error rates. Another problem is that such inappropriate analysis may prohibit a correct assessment of causal relationships between site-specific variables. The host-factor can act as an effect modifier and modulate the magnitude of the site-specific effects and/or the host-factor can act as a confounder by superimposing a patient-effect on the studied site-specific effects leading to bias. As a result, site-specific biological mechanisms of disease progression may be misinterpreted. Sites can be used as the experimental unit of analysis, but the sampling design from which the site-specific data originated should not be ignored.
由于有人声称个体内的牙周部位可在统计模型中用作独立观察对象,因此对特定部位变量之间关系的评估一直存在争议。这种方法的一个问题是计算出的I型和II型错误率不可靠。另一个问题是,这种不恰当的分析可能会妨碍对特定部位变量之间因果关系的正确评估。宿主因素可作为效应修饰因子,调节特定部位效应的大小,和/或宿主因素可作为混杂因素,通过将患者效应叠加在所研究的特定部位效应上而导致偏差。结果,疾病进展的特定部位生物学机制可能会被误解。部位可作为分析的实验单位,但不应忽视产生特定部位数据的抽样设计。