Wei Bo, Wang Liming, Jin Chengzhe, Xu Yan
Department of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (the First Hospital of Nanjing), Nanjing Jiangsu, 210006, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):283-7.
To investigate the short-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with SL-PLUS MIA femoral stem prosthesis by comparing with the SL-PLUS prosthesis.
Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 33 patients (38 hips) undergoing THA with SL-PLUS MIA femoral stem prosthesis (trial group) between June and December 2011, which was compared with those of 35 patients (40 hips) with SL-PLUS prosthesis (control group) during the same period. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, etiology, preoperative range of motion (ROM) of hip, and preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The incision length, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss were recorded during operation. The improvement of hip joint function was evaluated according to Harris score criteria. The ROM of hip was measured, and the X-ray film was taken to observe the position of prosthesis.
Trial group had shorter incision length, less operation time, and less intraoperative blood loss than control group, showing significant differences (P < 0.05). All wounds healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 10-16 months (mean, 13.6 months). During follow-up, 5 cases (5 hips) of control group and 3 cases (3 hips) of trial group still had pain of hips. At last follow-up, the ROM of hip was (152.48 +/- 9.68) degrees in trial group and (152.16 +/- 8.18) degrees in control group, the Harris score was 91.4 +/- 2.9 in trial group and 90.9 +/- 1.8 in control group; there were significant differences when compared with preoperative values (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P > 0.05). X-ray films showed good position of the prosthesis with no displacement, loosening, or subsidence in both groups.
SL-PLUS MIA femoral stem prosthesis has less surgical trauma and blood loss than SL-PLUS prosthesis during THA. The short-term effectiveness is satisfactory, but the long-term effectiveness still needs further observation.
通过与SL-PLUS假体比较,探讨SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假体在全髋关节置换术(THA)中的短期疗效。
回顾性分析2011年6月至12月行SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假体全髋关节置换术的33例患者(38髋)的临床资料(试验组),并与同期行SL-PLUS假体置换的35例患者(40髋)(对照组)进行比较。两组患者在性别、年龄、病程、病因、术前髋关节活动范围(ROM)及术前Harris评分方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。记录手术过程中的切口长度、手术时间及术中出血量。根据Harris评分标准评估髋关节功能改善情况。测量髋关节ROM,并拍摄X线片观察假体位置。
试验组切口长度短于对照组,手术时间及术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有伤口均一期愈合。所有患者均获随访,随访时间10~16个月,平均13.6个月。随访期间,对照组5例(5髋)、试验组3例(3髋)仍有髋关节疼痛。末次随访时,试验组髋关节ROM为(152.48±9.68)°,对照组为(152.16±8.18)°;试验组Harris评分为91.4±2.9,对照组为90.9±1.8;与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。X线片显示两组假体位置良好,无移位、松动或下沉。
THA中,SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假体较SL-PLUS假体手术创伤小、出血少。短期疗效满意,但长期疗效仍需进一步观察。