2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 May 14;13:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-85.
Proton-pump inhibitors such as omeprazole are a standard treatment to prevent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal mucosal injuries. However, it is unclear which drugs may protect against all NSAID-induced digestive-tract injuries. Here, we compare the efficacy of the gastromucoprotective drug irsogladine with omeprazole in preventing NSAID-induced esophagitis, peptic ulcers, and small-intestinal mucosal injury in healthy subjects.
Thirty-two healthy volunteers were assigned to an irsogladine group (Group I; n = 16) receiving diclofenac sodium 75 mg and irsogladine 4 mg daily for 14 days, or an omeprazole group (Group O; n = 16) receiving diclofenac sodium 75 mg and omeprazole 10 mg daily for 14 days. Esophagitis and peptic ulcers were evaluated by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and small-intestinal injuries by capsule endoscopy, fecal calprotectin, and fecal occult blood before and after treatment.
There was no significant difference between Group I and Group O with respect to the change in lesion score in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum before and after treatment.NSAID treatment significantly increased the number of small intestinal mucosal breaks per subject by capsule endoscopic evaluation, from a basal level of 0.1 ± 0.3 up to 1.9 ± 2.0 lesions in Group O (p = 0.0002). In contrast, there were no significant changes in the mean number of mucosal breaks before and after co-treatment in Group I (0.3 ± 0.8 to 0.5 ± 0.7, p = 0.62), and the between-group difference was significant (p = 0.0040). Fecal calprotectin concentration, when the concentration before treatment was defined as 1, was significantly increased both in Group O (from 1.0 ± 0.0 to 18.1 ± 37.1, p = 0.0002) and Group I (from 1.0 ± 0.0 to 6.0 ± 11.1, p = 0.0280); the degree of increase in Group O was significantly higher compared with that in Group I (p<0.05). In addition, fecal occult blood levels increased significantly in Group O (p = 0.0018), but there was no change in Group I (p = 1.0), and the between-group difference was significant (p = 0.0031).
Irsogladine protected against NSAID-induced mucosal injuries throughout the gastrointestinal tract, from esophagus to small intestine, significantly better than omeprazole.
This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Registry ID number; UMIN000008114).
质子泵抑制剂(如奥美拉唑)是预防非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)引起的上消化道黏膜损伤的标准治疗方法。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种药物可以预防所有 NSAID 引起的消化道损伤。在这里,我们比较了胃黏膜保护剂伊索格拉定与奥美拉唑预防健康受试者 NSAID 诱导的食管炎、消化性溃疡和小肠黏膜损伤的疗效。
32 名健康志愿者被分配到伊索格拉定组(I 组,n=16),每天接受双氯芬酸钠 75mg 和伊索格拉定 4mg 治疗 14 天,或奥美拉唑组(O 组,n=16),每天接受双氯芬酸钠 75mg 和奥美拉唑 10mg 治疗 14 天。治疗前后通过食管胃十二指肠镜检查评估食管炎和消化性溃疡,通过胶囊内镜检查、粪便钙卫蛋白和粪便隐血评估小肠黏膜损伤。
I 组和 O 组治疗前后食管、胃和十二指肠病变评分的变化无显著差异。NSAID 治疗显著增加了胶囊内镜评估的每个受试者小肠黏膜破裂的数量,从基线水平的 0.1±0.3 增加到 O 组的 1.9±2.0 个病变(p=0.0002)。相比之下,I 组治疗前后平均黏膜破裂数量无显著变化(0.3±0.8 至 0.5±0.7,p=0.62),且两组间差异具有统计学意义(p=0.0040)。粪便钙卫蛋白浓度,当以治疗前的浓度定义为 1 时,O 组(从 1.0±0.0 增加到 18.1±37.1,p=0.0002)和 I 组(从 1.0±0.0 增加到 6.0±11.1,p=0.0280)均显著增加;O 组的增加程度明显高于 I 组(p<0.05)。此外,O 组粪便隐血水平显著升高(p=0.0018),但 I 组无变化(p=1.0),两组间差异具有统计学意义(p=0.0031)。
伊索格拉定对 NSAID 诱导的整个胃肠道黏膜损伤(从食管到小肠)的保护作用明显优于奥美拉唑。
本研究在 UMIN 临床试验注册系统(注册号:UMIN000008114)进行了注册。