Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, 310 E 14th St, New York, NY 10003, USA.
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 May;15(3):167-73. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.44.
Although a number of mandibular and occlusal problems may be addressed by orthodontic treatment alone, dentofacial osteotomies are often needed to achieve desired functional or cosmetic results. With the increased popularity of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in recent years, the role of the facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon is crucial in the multidisciplinary care of patients with such problems.
To review the history and evolution of mandibular osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis and to discuss indications, advantages, disadvantages, and recent advances of these techniques.
Medline and PubMed searches without date limits, confined to publications in English, German, and French languages were used to search for terms mandibular advancement, mandibular osteotomy, orthognathic surgery, mandibular distraction osteogenesis, prognathism, and retrognathism in the respective languages. References not found on the sources noted were found in print form in the New York Medical College Library when needed. Particular techniques, as originally described or relating to mandibular osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis, were critically reviewed.
The goal of surgical mandibular modification procedures is to correct a variety of craniofacial abnormalities for both functional and aesthetic purposes. Multiple techniques of both mandibular osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis have been shown to be effective. Their effectiveness and utility is primarily determined by the specific craniofacial defect and desired outcome, as well as surgeon preference and patient compliance.
While mandibular osteotomy has evolved tremendously, distraction osteogenesis continues to grow as a leading method of surgical correction for a variety of craniofacial defects. Current research shows significant strides in making distraction more effective and efficient to use for both the surgeon and the patient. With the growing popularity of these procedures, the up-to-date knowledge of the facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon in these advances is of utmost importance.
尽管正畸治疗可以解决许多下颌和咬合问题,但为了达到理想的功能或美容效果,通常需要进行正颌手术。近年来,由于下颌骨牵引成骨术的普及,颌面整形外科医生在这些患者的多学科治疗中起着至关重要的作用。
回顾下颌骨切开术和牵引成骨术的历史和发展,并讨论这些技术的适应证、优点、缺点和最新进展。
使用 Medline 和 PubMed 进行了无时间限制的搜索,仅限于英文、德文和法文的出版物,使用的检索词为 mandibular advancement、mandibular osteotomy、orthognathic surgery、mandibular distraction osteogenesis、prognathism 和 retrognathism。在所指出的来源中未找到的参考文献,在需要时通过纽约医学院图书馆的印刷形式找到。对特定技术进行了批判性评价,这些技术最初是按照描述或与下颌骨切开术和下颌骨牵引成骨术有关。
手术下颌修正程序的目的是为了纠正各种颅面畸形,以达到功能和美观的目的。已经证明多种下颌骨切开术和牵引成骨术技术都非常有效。它们的有效性和实用性主要取决于特定的颅面缺陷和预期结果,以及外科医生的偏好和患者的依从性。
虽然下颌骨切开术已经有了巨大的发展,但牵引成骨术仍然是各种颅面缺陷手术矫正的主要方法。目前的研究表明,在使牵引更有效和高效地用于外科医生和患者方面取得了重大进展。随着这些手术的普及,颌面整形外科医生对这些进展的最新知识至关重要。