Commonwealth Medical College, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Aug;69(2):288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.02.030. Epub 2013 May 14.
Recently, polarized microscopy was reported as helpful in the evaluation of alopecia biopsy specimens.
We sought to determine the usefulness of polarized microscopy relative to elastic tissue staining and fluorescent microscopy.
Histologic sections from 60 alopecia specimens were evaluated to determine the pattern of elastic tissue in elastic van Gieson-stained sections. Comparable hematoxylin-eosin sections were examined under a fluorescent microscope to determine the elastic tissue pattern and examined under polarized microscopy to determine the pattern of birefringence.
Elastic van Gieson staining demonstrated high sensitivity (1.0) and high specificity (1.0) for the identification of nonscarring alopecia. In 54 of 60 cases, fluorescent microscopy demonstrated an identical pattern of elastic tissue. High background eosin fluorescence made it impossible to interpret the elastic tissue pattern in the remaining 6 specimens. Strong birefringence in dermal collagen sparing fibrous tracts had high specificity (1.0) but lower sensitivity (0.59). Strong collagen birefringence within the dermis and broad fibrous tracts were present in all 6 cases of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia.
Elimination of the 6 uninterpretable specimens with high background fluorescence from our calculations may be a source of bias, as these cases could potentially all have been either negative or positive.
Elastic tissue staining is the most reliable means to determine the pattern of scarring in alopecia biopsy specimens. In most cases, fluorescent microscopy of hematoxylin-eosin sections shows an identical pattern. Although a pattern of collagen birefringence on polarized microscopy distinctly sparing fibrous tract is specific for nonscarring alopecia, not all cases of nonscarring alopecia demonstrate this pattern. Strong collagen birefringence within both the dermis and fibrous tracts suggests a diagnosis of central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia.
最近,偏光显微镜被报道有助于评估脱发活检标本。
我们旨在确定偏光显微镜相对于弹性组织染色和荧光显微镜的有用性。
评估 60 个脱发标本的组织切片,以确定弹性组织在弹性 Van Gieson 染色切片中的模式。用荧光显微镜检查相同的苏木精-伊红切片,以确定弹性组织模式,并在偏光显微镜下检查以确定双折射模式。
弹性 Van Gieson 染色对非瘢痕性脱发的识别具有高灵敏度(1.0)和高特异性(1.0)。在 60 例中有 54 例,荧光显微镜显示出相同的弹性组织模式。在其余 6 例中,高背景嗜酸性荧光使弹性组织模式无法解释。真皮胶原纤维束中保留的纤维束的强烈双折射具有高特异性(1.0)但敏感性较低(0.59)。真皮内和宽纤维束中强烈的胶原双折射存在于所有 6 例中央离心性瘢痕性脱发中。
从我们的计算中消除具有高背景荧光的 6 个不可解释的标本可能是偏倚的来源,因为这些病例可能都是阴性或阳性的。
弹性组织染色是确定脱发活检标本瘢痕模式的最可靠方法。在大多数情况下,苏木精-伊红切片的荧光显微镜显示出相同的模式。虽然偏光显微镜上的胶原双折射模式明显保留纤维束是无瘢痕性脱发的特异性表现,但并非所有无瘢痕性脱发病例都表现出这种模式。真皮和纤维束内均存在强烈的胶原双折射提示中央离心性瘢痕性脱发的诊断。