Dowd Bryan, Karmarker Medha, Swenson Tami, Parashuram Shriram, Kane Robert, Coulam Robert, Jeffery Molly Moore
1University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):135-43. doi: 10.1177/1062860613487196. Epub 2013 May 17.
Visits to the emergency department (ED) are costly, and because some of them are potentially avoidable, some types of ED visits also may be indicative of poor care management, inadequate access to care, or poor choices on the part of beneficiaries. Billings and colleagues developed an algorithm to analyze ED visits and assign probabilities that each visit falls into several categories of appropriateness. The algorithm has been used previously to assess the appropriateness of ED visits at the community or facility level. In this analysis, the authors explain how the Billings algorithm works and how it can be applied to individual physician practices. The authors then present illustrative data from 2 years of Medicare claims data from 5 states. About one third of ED visits are deemed appropriate, and about half could have been treated in a primary care outpatient setting. Another 15% were deemed preventable or avoidable.
急诊就诊费用高昂,而且由于其中一些就诊可能是可以避免的,某些类型的急诊就诊也可能表明护理管理不善、获得医疗服务的机会不足或受益人的选择不佳。比林斯及其同事开发了一种算法,用于分析急诊就诊情况,并为每次就诊属于几种适当类别之一分配概率。该算法此前已用于评估社区或机构层面急诊就诊的适当性。在本分析中,作者解释了比林斯算法的工作原理以及如何将其应用于个体医生的诊疗实践。然后,作者展示了来自5个州两年医疗保险理赔数据的说明性数据。约三分之一的急诊就诊被认为是适当的,约一半的就诊本可在初级保健门诊环境中得到治疗。另外15%被认为是可预防或可避免 的。