Colquhoun Douglas A, Dunn Lauren K, Thiele Robert H
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0710, USA.
J Med Eng Technol. 2013 May;37(4):252-8. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2013.789564. Epub 2013 May 20.
Respiratory variation in the systemic arterial blood pressure tracing is predictive of the change in cardiac output following volume administration. However, significant inter-individual variability exists. Animal data suggest that systemic arterial respiratory variation loses its predictive ability in the setting of right ventricular failure. Human studies suggest that patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressures are relatively unresponsive to volume administration. The current respiratory variation paradigm neglects the haemodynamic contribution of the right ventricular system. The goal of this study was to determine whether respiratory variation in the pulmonary arterial system could be attributed to intra-thoracic pressure changes. Systemic (radial) and pulmonary arterial pressure waveforms as well as all ventilatory variables were extracted from a haemodynamic database. Using a fast Fourier transformation, the ratio of respiratory (0.15-0.5 Hz) to cardiac (0.67-3 Hz) power was calculated every minute for both arterial waveforms, yielding two 'spectral power ratios' (SPoR). SPoR was compared to all available ventilatory parameters using a linear regression technique. From 19 patients 3422 min of data was analysed. There were statistically significant (p < 0.05) but clinically insignificant correlations between SPoR(radial) and mean airway pressure (r = -0.0462) and minute ventilation (r = -0.130). All tested correlations between SPoR(pulmonary) and ventilatory parameters were statistically significant, with correlations ranging from 0.112-0.224 (median 0.194). The correlation between SPoR(pulmonary) and SPoR(radial) was stronger than the correlation between either measure of respiratory variation and any of the ventilatory parameters (r = 0.342, p < 0.001). Respiratory variation in the pulmonary arterial tracing does not appear to be closely related to ventilatory parameters and is more closely related to systemic arterial respiratory variation, a well-validated estimate of volume status. The observed respiratory variation in the pulmonary arterial pressure tracing may be related to cyclical changes in pre-load or after-load that occur with mechanical ventilation and may affect the predictive power of systemic arterial respiratory variation.
体循环动脉血压描记图中的呼吸变化可预测容量输注后心输出量的变化。然而,个体间存在显著差异。动物数据表明,在右心室衰竭的情况下,体循环动脉呼吸变化失去其预测能力。人体研究表明,肺动脉压升高的患者对容量输注相对无反应。当前的呼吸变化模式忽略了右心室系统的血流动力学贡献。本研究的目的是确定肺动脉系统中的呼吸变化是否可归因于胸内压变化。从血流动力学数据库中提取体循环(桡动脉)和肺动脉压力波形以及所有通气变量。使用快速傅里叶变换,每分钟计算两种动脉波形的呼吸(0.15 - 0.5 Hz)与心脏(0.67 - 3 Hz)功率之比,得出两个“频谱功率比”(SPoR)。使用线性回归技术将SPoR与所有可用的通气参数进行比较。分析了19例患者的3422分钟数据。SPoR(桡动脉)与平均气道压(r = -0.0462)和分钟通气量(r = -0.130)之间存在统计学显著(p < 0.05)但临床意义不显著的相关性。SPoR(肺动脉)与通气参数之间所有测试的相关性均具有统计学显著性,相关性范围为0.112 - 0.224(中位数0.194)。SPoR(肺动脉)与SPoR(桡动脉)之间的相关性强于任何一种呼吸变化测量值与任何通气参数之间的相关性(r = 0.342,p < 0.001)。肺动脉描记图中的呼吸变化似乎与通气参数没有密切关系,而与体循环动脉呼吸变化更密切相关,体循环动脉呼吸变化是对容量状态的一种经过充分验证的估计。观察到的肺动脉压力描记图中的呼吸变化可能与机械通气时发生的前负荷或后负荷的周期性变化有关,并且可能影响体循环动脉呼吸变化的预测能力。