Dibai Filho Almir Vieira, Packer Amanda Carine, Costa Ana Cláudia de Souza, Rodrigues-Bigaton Delaine
Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 May;36(4):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 23.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of infrared thermography of the central point of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder (TMD).
This is an observational study of university women with and without TMD. Through the use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, 104 women were divided into a TMD group (n = 52) and control group (n = 52). All volunteers had their masseter and anterior temporalis muscles evaluated by infrared thermography. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the accuracy of diagnosis (area under the ROC curve), the best cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity.
No significant differences were observed (P > .05) in the skin surface temperature of the masticatory muscles, when the groups were compared. With regard to the ROC curve, the area under the curve was lower than the recommended for all the muscles tested, ranging from 0.433 to 0.502.
The findings of this study suggest that infrared thermography of the masticatory muscles is not an accurate instrument for the myogenous TMD diagnosis.
本研究旨在评估咬肌和颞肌前部中心点的红外热成像技术在诊断肌源性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)方面的准确性。
这是一项针对患有和未患有TMD的大学女性的观察性研究。通过使用颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准,将104名女性分为TMD组(n = 52)和对照组(n = 52)。所有志愿者均通过红外热成像技术对咬肌和颞肌前部进行评估。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定诊断准确性(ROC曲线下面积)、最佳截断点、敏感性和特异性。
比较两组时,咀嚼肌皮肤表面温度未观察到显著差异(P > 0.05)。关于ROC曲线,曲线下面积低于所有测试肌肉推荐的值,范围为0.433至0.502。
本研究结果表明,咀嚼肌的红外热成像技术不是诊断肌源性TMD的准确工具。