Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 910 West 10th Avenue, Room 3114, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E3, Canada.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):590-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3087-3.
Surgeons have several implant choices when managing Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures about the hip. Few long-term studies have reported outcomes for tapered fluted titanium stems.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) survival, with femoral revision as the end point, of distal taper stems in the treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures at our institution, (2) radiographic outcomes, and (3) quality of life and hip function after revision.
Of the 200 patients with Vancouver B2 or B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision between February 2000 and February 2010, 55 (38 B2, 17 B3) were treated with modular tapered titanium stems. Of the surviving 47 patients, one was lost to followup, leaving 46 (30 B2, 16 B3) available for review at a mean of 54 months (range, 24-143 months). Initial indications for using these implants were treatment of periprosthetic fractures where less than 4 cm of diaphyseal fit was available, but this evolved during the study period to all fractures unless no diaphysis remained, in which case complex revision techniques were used. Radiographs were assessed to establish fracture healing, stem subsidence, and bone stock restoration. Quality of life and hip function were assessed using WOMAC, Oxford, SF-12, UCLA activity level, and satisfaction scores.
Two femoral stems were revised: one subsided and was revised at 12 months; the other had deep infection and underwent two-stage revision at 49 months. Radiographic review showed one nonunion, with maintenance or improvement of bone stock in 89% of patients. Subsidence occurred in 24%. Mean Oxford score was 76 of 100, WOMAC function and pain scores were 75 and 82 of 100, satisfaction score was 91 of 100, and SF-12 mental and physical scores were 53 and 40 of 100.
We report encouraging short-term results in terms of survival of distal taper stems in the treatment of B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures. Although subsidence was frequent, most migrated less than 3 mm without correlation to poor pain and functional scores.
处理髋关节周围 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型假体周围骨折时,外科医生有多种植入物选择。很少有长期研究报告过锥形开槽钛制干骺端髓内钉的结果。
问题/目的:我们确定了(1)在我院,使用远端锥形干治疗 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型假体周围骨折的股骨翻修的存活率,以股骨翻修为终点,(2)影像学结果,以及(3)翻修后的生活质量和髋关节功能。
在 2000 年 2 月至 2010 年 2 月期间,我们对 200 例 Vancouver B2 或 B3 型假体周围骨折患者进行了股骨翻修治疗,其中 55 例(38 例 B2,17 例 B3)采用了模块化锥形钛制干。在幸存的 47 例患者中,1 例失访,46 例(30 例 B2,16 例 B3)可在平均 54 个月(24-143 个月)时进行复查。最初使用这些植入物的适应证是治疗假体周围骨折,骨折处的骨干适配长度小于 4cm,但在研究期间,所有骨折都使用了这些植入物,除非没有骨干残留,否则会使用复杂的翻修技术。通过 X 线评估来确定骨折愈合、干骺端下沉和骨量恢复情况。使用 WOMAC、Oxford、SF-12、UCLA 活动水平和满意度评分来评估生活质量和髋关节功能。
有 2 例股骨干发生翻修:1 例下沉,在 12 个月时翻修;另 1 例发生深部感染,在 49 个月时行二期翻修。影像学检查显示 1 例骨不连,89%的患者骨量保持或改善。下沉发生在 24%的患者中。Oxford 平均评分为 100 分中的 76 分,WOMAC 功能和疼痛评分分别为 100 分中的 75 分和 82 分,满意度评分为 100 分中的 91 分,SF-12 精神和身体评分分别为 100 分中的 53 分和 40 分。
我们报告了治疗 B2 和 B3 型假体周围骨折的远端锥形干骺端髓内钉的短期存活率令人鼓舞的结果。虽然下沉很常见,但大多数患者的下沉小于 3mm,与疼痛和功能评分不佳无关。