Loukogeorgakis Stavros P, Pierro Agostino
Pediatric Surgery Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jun;23(3):182-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1347915. Epub 2013 May 29.
Esophageal replacement surgery is the treatment of choice in children with esophageal atresia (EA) when a long defect does not allow restoration of esophageal continuity, or when primary repair has failed. The stomach, colon, and small intestine have been used successfully to create conduits, but there is still no consensus among pediatric surgeons regarding the optimal method for substituting the native esophagus. Current evidence on short- and long-term outcomes of esophageal replacement originates from small-size, retrospective reports and well-designed comparative studies are lacking. Moreover, there is significant heterogeneity in the way outcomes are reported, which makes data pooling and comparison very challenging. In this review, we focus on the most recent evidence on outcomes of the most popular replacement techniques (colonic interposition, gastric transposition, gastric tube reconstruction, and jejunal interposition) used in pediatric patients with EA.
当存在长段缺损无法恢复食管连续性或初次修复失败时,食管替代手术是食管闭锁(EA)患儿的首选治疗方法。胃、结肠和小肠已成功用于构建管道,但小儿外科医生对于替代天然食管的最佳方法仍未达成共识。目前关于食管替代短期和长期结局的证据来自小规模的回顾性报告,缺乏精心设计的对照研究。此外,结局报告方式存在显著异质性,这使得数据汇总和比较极具挑战性。在本综述中,我们重点关注小儿EA患者中最常用替代技术(结肠间置术、胃转位术、胃管重建术和空肠间置术)结局的最新证据。