• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与安养机构身体约束相关的风险因素:台湾一项基于社区的流行病学调查

Risk factors associated with physical restraints in residential aged care facilities: a community-based epidemiological survey in Taiwan.

作者信息

Huang Hui Chi, Huang Yu Tai, Lin Kuan Chia, Kuo Yong Fang

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Information Science and Applications Alumni Association, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jan;70(1):130-43. doi: 10.1111/jan.12176. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1111/jan.12176
PMID:23734585
Abstract

AIM

To identify the rate and risk factors of physical restraint in residential aged care facilities in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND

In Taiwan, physical restraint is commonly used in aged care facilities to prevent accidents. Many are unaware of the associated risks. Restrained residents cannot move freely, increasing the risk of atrophy and leading to reduced physical functioning.

DESIGN

A community-based epidemiological survey.

METHODS

Data were collected from June-December 2007 across 178 residential aged care facilities with 5,173 residential beds in the target city of Taiwan. Twenty facilities were sampled using probability proportional to size by beds and accreditation ranking. In all, 256 primary caregivers (78 nurses and 178 care aides) and 847 residents completed the study questionnaires and tests. A multilevel analysis approach was used to identify individual- and facility-level risk factors for physical restraint and assess the variation in physical restraint at the individual- and facility-level.

RESULTS

Of 847 residents, 62% (527) were restrained during the study period. The main reasons for restraint use were fall prevention and prevention of tube removal. Resident level risk factors for physical restraint included lower Barthel Index scores (more dependent) and an agreement allowing the use of physical restraint to avoid injury signed by a family member or social worker. A facility-level risk factor for physical restraint was younger primary caregivers.

CONCLUSION

To reduce the incidence of physical restraint in residential aged care facilities in Taiwan, educational programmes should target primary caregivers and families in facilities.

摘要

目的

确定台湾地区安养机构中身体约束的发生率及危险因素。

背景

在台湾,安养机构中常用身体约束来预防事故。许多人并未意识到其中的相关风险。被约束的居民无法自由活动,增加了萎缩风险并导致身体机能下降。

设计

一项基于社区的流行病学调查。

方法

于2007年6月至12月间,在台湾目标城市的178家设有5173张床位的安养机构收集数据。采用按床位数量和认证等级与规模成比例的概率抽样方法选取20家机构。共有256名主要照顾者(78名护士和178名护理员)以及847名居民完成了研究问卷和测试。采用多水平分析方法来确定身体约束的个体和机构层面危险因素,并评估个体和机构层面身体约束情况的差异。

结果

在847名居民中,62%(527名)在研究期间受到约束。使用约束的主要原因是预防跌倒和防止管道脱落。身体约束的居民层面危险因素包括巴氏指数得分较低(依赖性更强)以及有家庭成员或社会工作者签署的允许使用身体约束以避免受伤的协议。身体约束的机构层面危险因素是较年轻的主要照顾者。

结论

为降低台湾地区安养机构中身体约束的发生率,应针对机构中的主要照顾者和家属开展教育项目。

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with physical restraints in residential aged care facilities: a community-based epidemiological survey in Taiwan.与安养机构身体约束相关的风险因素:台湾一项基于社区的流行病学调查
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jan;70(1):130-43. doi: 10.1111/jan.12176. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
2
What factors contribute to the need for physical restraint in institutionalized residents in Taiwan?是什么因素导致台湾机构内居住者需要身体约束?
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0276058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276058. eCollection 2022.
3
Does access to bed-chair pressure sensors reduce physical restraint use in the rehabilitative care setting?在康复护理环境中,使用床椅压力传感器是否能减少身体约束的使用?
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):581-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01354.x.
4
[Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing home residents with dementia].[一种多因素干预措施对减少痴呆症养老院居民身体约束的有效性]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2005 Feb;38(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s00391-005-0289-7.
5
Use of physical restraints in nursing homes and hospitals and related factors: a cross-sectional study.养老院和医院中使用身体约束及其相关因素的横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Apr;21(7-8):1033-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03931.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
6
Effects of small-scale, home-like facilities in dementia care on residents' behavior, and use of physical restraints and psychotropic drugs: a quasi-experimental study.小型家庭式设施在痴呆症护理中对居民行为、身体约束使用和精神药物使用的影响:一项准实验研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):657-68. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002512. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
The prevalence, incidence and risk factors for delirium in Dutch nursing homes and residential care homes.荷兰护理院和养老院中谵妄的患病率、发病率和危险因素。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;27(7):709-15. doi: 10.1002/gps.2770. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
8
Factors Associated With the Trend of Physical and Chemical Restraint Use Among Long-Term Care Facility Residents in Hong Kong: Data From an 11-Year Observational Study.与香港长期护理机构居民身体和化学约束使用趋势相关的因素:一项为期 11 年的观察研究数据。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1043-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
The impact of fall risk assessment on nurse fears, patient falls, and functional ability in long-term care.跌倒风险评估对长期护理中护士恐惧、患者跌倒及功能能力的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(11):1041-52. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1085102. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
Caregiver fear of falling and functional ability among seniors residing in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中老年人的护理人员对跌倒的恐惧及功能能力
Gerontology. 2009;55(4):460-7. doi: 10.1159/000221007. Epub 2009 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Is physical restraint unethical and illegal?: a qualitative analysis of Korean written judgments.身体约束是否不道德且违法?:对韩国书面判决的定性分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 4;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01781-8.
2
Nursing Ethical Decision Making on Adult Physical Restraint: A Scoping Review.成人身体约束的护理伦理决策:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 9;21(1):75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010075.
3
Theories for interventions to reduce physical and verbal abuse: A mixed methods review of the health and social care literature to inform future maternity care.
减少身体和言语虐待的干预理论:对健康与社会护理文献的混合方法综述,以为未来的孕产妇护理提供参考。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;3(4):e0001594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001594. eCollection 2023.
4
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
5
The optimal intervention for preventing physical restraints among older adults living in the nursing home: A systematic review.养老院中老年人预防身体约束的最佳干预措施:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3533-3546. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1632. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
What factors contribute to the need for physical restraint in institutionalized residents in Taiwan?是什么因素导致台湾机构内居住者需要身体约束?
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0276058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276058. eCollection 2022.
7
Effectiveness of De-Escalation in Reducing Aggression and Coercion in Acute Psychiatric Units. A Cluster Randomized Study.降低急性精神科病房攻击性行为和强制约束措施中降级策略的有效性:一项整群随机研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 7;13:856153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.856153. eCollection 2022.
8
Difference of Physical Restraint Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Between Nurses and Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Study.长期护理机构中护士与护理助理在身体约束知识、态度和实践方面的差异:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Feb 16;15:243-255. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S349545. eCollection 2022.
9
Definition and Measurement of Physical and Chemical Restraint in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review.长期护理中身体和化学约束的定义和测量:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073639.
10
An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict the Intention and Practice of Nursing Staff Toward Physical Restraint Use in Long-Term Care Facilities: Structural Equation Modeling.计划行为理论在预测长期护理机构护理人员使用身体约束的意图和实践中的应用:结构方程模型
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Mar 2;14:275-287. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S293759. eCollection 2021.