Department of Sociology, California State University, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA.
Violence Against Women. 2013 May;19(5):579-601. doi: 10.1177/1077801213490558. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
Our knowledge of the role of plaintiff gender in shaping the judicial decision to issue restraining orders rests upon only two studies. Both conclude that judges discriminate against male victims. Each is constrained by small male sample size, few control variables, and limited statistical analysis. We replicate one of these studies. In the issuance of temporary orders we find a gender difference, though with a greatly reduced effect size compared to the earlier study. Legally relevant gender differences may explain this disparity. Plaintiff gender had no effect on the judicial decision to set hearing dates or to issue a permanent order.
我们对于原告性别在塑造签发禁制令这一司法决定方面的作用的了解仅基于两项研究。这两项研究都得出了法官歧视男性受害者的结论。每一项研究都受到男性样本量小、控制变量少和有限的统计分析的限制。我们复制了其中一项研究。在签发临时命令方面,我们发现了性别差异,尽管与早期研究相比,其效果要小得多。法律上相关的性别差异可能解释了这种差异。原告的性别对设定听证日期或签发永久命令的司法决定没有影响。