Suppr超能文献

[用于评估心脏病门诊患者工作能力的校准题库检验]

[Examination of calibrated item banks for the assessment of work capacity in an outpatient sample of cardiological patients].

作者信息

Haschke A, Abberger B, Schröder K, Wirtz M, Bengel J, Baumeister H

机构信息

Abteilung für Rehabilitationspsychologie und Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.

出版信息

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2013 Dec;52(6):383-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331230. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Work capacity is a major outcome variable in cardiological rehabilitation. However, there is a lacks of capacious and economic assessment instruments for work capacity. By developing item response theory based item banks a first step to close this gap is done. The present study aims to validate the work capacity item banks for cardiovascular rehabilitation inpatients (WCIB-Cardio) in a sample of cardiovascular rehabilitation outpatients. Additionally, we examined differences between in- and outpatients with regard to their work capacity.

METHODS

Data of 283 cardiovascular rehabilitation inpatients and 77 cardiovascular rehabilitation outpatients were collected in 15 rehabilitation centres. The WCIB-Cardio contains the 2 domains of "cognitive work capacity"(20 items) and "physical work capacity"(18 items). Validation of the item bank for cardiological outpatients was conducted with separate Rasch analysis for each domain.

RESULTS

For the domain of cognitive work capacity 10 items showed satisfying quality criteria (Rasch reliability=0.71; overall model fit=0.07). For the domain of physical work capacity good values for Rasch-reliability (0.83) and overall -model fit (0.65) could be proven after exclusion of 3 items. Unidimensionality and a broad ability spectrum could be covered for both domains. With regard to content, outpatients evaluate themselves less burdened than inpatients for the domain of cognitive work capacity (‾X outpatient =-2.06 vs. ‾X inpatient =-2.49; p<0.07) similarly for the domain of physical work capacity (‾X outpatient =-3.68 vs. ‾X inpatient =-2.88; p<0.01).

DISCUSSION

With the WCIB-Cardio II there is a precondition to develop self-report instruments of work capacity in cardiological in- and outpatients.

摘要

背景

工作能力是心脏康复中的一个主要结果变量。然而,目前缺乏用于评估工作能力的全面且经济的评估工具。通过基于项目反应理论开发题库,朝着填补这一空白迈出了第一步。本研究旨在对心血管康复门诊患者样本中的心血管康复住院患者工作能力题库(WCIB-Cardio)进行验证。此外,我们还研究了住院患者和门诊患者在工作能力方面的差异。

方法

在15个康复中心收集了283名心血管康复住院患者和77名心血管康复门诊患者的数据。WCIB-Cardio包含“认知工作能力”(20个项目)和“体力工作能力”(18个项目)两个领域。对每个领域分别进行Rasch分析,以验证心脏病门诊患者的题库。

结果

在认知工作能力领域,10个项目显示出令人满意的质量标准(Rasch信度=0.71;整体模型拟合度=0.07)。在体力工作能力领域,排除3个项目后,Rasch信度(0.83)和整体模型拟合度(0.65)的值良好。两个领域均能涵盖单维性和广泛的能力范围。在内容方面,门诊患者在认知工作能力领域对自身负担的评估低于住院患者(门诊患者均值=-2.06,住院患者均值=-2.49;p<0.07),在体力工作能力领域也是如此(门诊患者均值=-3.68,住院患者均值=-2.88;p<0.01)。

讨论

有了WCIB-Cardio II,就有了开发心脏病住院患者和门诊患者工作能力自评工具的前提条件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验