Suppr超能文献

[非葡萄糖刺激试验与葡萄糖刺激试验在评估不同糖耐量个体胰岛β细胞功能中的比较]

[Comparison of non-glucose versus glucose stimulation test in estimating islet β-cell function in individuals with differential glucose tolerance].

作者信息

He Yang, Wang Chuan, Li Feng, Gheng Hua, Yan Li

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, SecSun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Mar 12;93(10):760-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the values of arginine stimulation, oral glucose-insulin release and intravenous glucose tolerance tests to assess the function of islet β-cell in individuals with differential glucose tolerance.

METHODS

Healthy subjects (n = 38) and those with impaired glucose regulation (IGR) without a family history of diabetes (n = 31), 32 normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 32) and impaired glucose regulation as first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (IGR, n = 36) and 35 newly-diagnosed type 2 DM (n = 35) were recruited. All of them received arginine C-peptide releasing test (AST), oral glucose-insulin release test (OG-IRT) and intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). ACRARG was used to reflect non-glucose stimulated insulin secretion function, AIR0-10 for first-phase insulin secretion function and ΔI30/ΔG30 for early insulin secretion function. The changes of islet-β-cell function indicators were detected in individuals with different glucose tolerance.

RESULTS

(1) No significant differences existed in ACRARG among five groups (all P > 0.05). (2) In terms of AIR0-10, the patients of type 2 DM had lower levels than those with IGR and NGT with or without a family history of DM (all P < 0.01). No significant difference existed among the subjects of IGR regardless of a family history of DM (P > 0.05). However, the subjects of IGR with or without a family history of DM had lower levels than those with NGT regardless of a family history of DM (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). The subjects of NGT with a family history of DM had lower levels than those with NGT without a family history of DM (50.0 (24.3 - 85.1) vs 69.4 (46.1 - 94.8), P < 0.05). (3) ΔI30/ΔG30: no significant difference existed between the patients of type 2 DM and IGT with a family history of DM (P > 0.05). However, the subjects of type 2 DM had lower levels than those of IGR without a family history of DM and NGT with or without a family history of DM (all P < 0.01). The subjects of IGR with or without a family history of DM had lower levels than those with NGT regardless of a family history of DM (all P < 0.01). No significant difference existed among the subjects of NGT with or without a family history of DM (P > 0.05). And it was the same with IGR group.

CONCLUSION

The acute C-peptide response to arginine stimulation test may not be used to evaluate the early phase insulin secretion among the subjects of early-stage DM, impaired glucose regulation and high diabetic risks.

摘要

目的

探讨精氨酸刺激试验、口服葡萄糖-胰岛素释放试验及静脉葡萄糖耐量试验在评估不同糖耐量个体胰岛β细胞功能中的价值。

方法

招募健康受试者(n = 38)、无糖尿病家族史的糖调节受损者(IGR,n = 31)、32例糖耐量正常(NGT,n = 32)且作为2型糖尿病(DM)一级亲属的糖调节受损者(IGR,n = 36)以及35例新诊断的2型DM患者(n = 35)。所有受试者均接受精氨酸C肽释放试验(AST)、口服葡萄糖-胰岛素释放试验(OG-IRT)及静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)。采用ACRARG反映非葡萄糖刺激的胰岛素分泌功能,AIR0-10反映第一时相胰岛素分泌功能,ΔI30/ΔG30反映早期胰岛素分泌功能。检测不同糖耐量个体胰岛β细胞功能指标的变化。

结果

(1)五组间ACRARG差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。(2)就AIR0-10而言,2型DM患者低于有或无糖尿病家族史的IGR及NGT患者(均P < 0.01)。无论有无糖尿病家族史,IGR受试者间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。然而,有或无糖尿病家族史的IGR受试者低于有或无糖尿病家族史的NGT受试者(P < 0.01或P < 0.05)。有糖尿病家族史的NGT受试者低于无糖尿病家族史的NGT受试者(50.0(24.3 - 85.1)对69.4(46.1 - 94.8),P < 0.05)。(3)ΔI30/ΔG30:有糖尿病家族史的2型DM患者与IGT患者间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。然而,2型DM患者低于无糖尿病家族史的IGR及有或无糖尿病家族史的NGT受试者(均P < 0.01)。有或无糖尿病家族史的IGR受试者低于有或无糖尿病家族史的NGT受试者(均P < 0.01)。有或无糖尿病家族史的NGT受试者间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。IGR组情况相同。

结论

精氨酸刺激试验的急性C肽反应可能不适用于评估早期DM、糖调节受损及糖尿病高风险受试者的早期胰岛素分泌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验