Astrup Birgitte Schmidt, Ravn Pernille, Thomsen Jørgen Lange, Lauritsen Jens
Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 17, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Jul;20(5):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
A pattern of genital injury that separates trauma seen in sexual assault cases from trauma seen following consensual sexual intercourse has been a matter of debate. This study aimed at clarifying the question by eliminating as many confounders as possible in a prospective, case-control setup. A total of 98 controls and 39 cases were examined using the naked eye, the colposcope and toluidine blue dye followed by colposcopy. The overall frequency of having at least one lesion was strikingly similar in the two groups, but cases had significantly more abrasions, a trend towards more haematomas and a higher frequency of multiple lesions. Cases had a higher frequency of lesions in locations other than the 6 o'clock position. Our data suggests that cases have larger, more complex lesions. In conclusion, this study has confirmed the existence of different patterns of genital lesions. Background data for detection of genital lesions using the three most commonly used techniques is provided. These results will aid in the interpretation of findings seen when examining sexual assault victims.
将性侵犯案件中所见创伤与自愿性交后所见创伤区分开来的生殖器损伤模式一直是一个有争议的问题。本研究旨在通过在前瞻性病例对照研究中尽可能消除混杂因素来澄清这个问题。使用肉眼、阴道镜和甲苯胺蓝染色后再进行阴道镜检查,对98名对照者和39名病例进行了检查。两组中至少有一处损伤的总体频率惊人地相似,但病例组的擦伤明显更多,血肿有增多趋势,多处损伤的频率更高。病例组在6点位置以外的部位损伤频率更高。我们的数据表明,病例组的损伤更大、更复杂。总之,本研究证实了生殖器损伤存在不同模式。提供了使用三种最常用技术检测生殖器损伤的背景数据。这些结果将有助于解释检查性侵犯受害者时所见的结果。