Suppr超能文献

用于控制性卵巢刺激的注射用重组人促卵泡激素或重组促卵泡素α治疗灵活性选项:ENGAGE试验的事后分析

Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH treatment flexibility options for controlled ovarian stimulation: a post hoc analysis of the Engage trial.

作者信息

Leader Arthur, Devroey Paul, Witjes Han, Gordon Keith

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Jun 11;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-52.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the impact of treatment flexibility on clinical outcomes in either a corifollitropin alfa or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) protocol.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy non-inferiority clinical trial (Engage). Efficacy outcomes were assessed on patients from the Engage trial who started treatment on menstrual cycle day 2 versus menstrual cycle day 3, patients who received rFSH step-down or fixed-dose rFSH, patients who received rFSH on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) compared with those who did not, and patients who received hCG when the criterion was reached versus those with a 1-day delay.

RESULTS

The effect of each of the treatment flexibility options on ongoing pregnancy rate was not significant. The estimated difference (95% confidence interval) in ongoing pregnancy rate was -4.3% (-9.4%, 0.8%) for patients who started ovarian stimulation on cycle day 2 versus day 3, 1.8% (-4.1%, 7.6%) for patients who received hCG on the day the hCG criterion was met versus 1 day after, 3.2% (-2.1%, 8.6%) for patients who received rFSH on the day of hCG administration versus those who did not, and -5.8% (-13.0%, 1.4%) for patients who received a reduced versus fixed-dose of rFSH from day 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment flexibility of ovarian stimulation does not substantially affect the clinical outcome in patients' treatment following initiation of ovarian stimulation with either corifollitropin alfa or with daily rFSH in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00696800.

摘要

背景

我们试图确定在使用注射用重组促卵泡素α或重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)方案时,治疗灵活性对临床结局的影响。

方法

对一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟非劣效性临床试验(Engage)进行事后分析。对Engage试验中在月经周期第2天与第3天开始治疗的患者、接受rFSH递减剂量或固定剂量rFSH的患者、在人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)当天接受rFSH治疗的患者与未接受rFSH治疗的患者,以及达到标准时接受hCG治疗的患者与延迟1天接受hCG治疗的患者的疗效结局进行评估。

结果

每种治疗灵活性选项对持续妊娠率的影响均不显著。在月经周期第2天开始卵巢刺激的患者与第3天开始卵巢刺激的患者相比,持续妊娠率的估计差异(95%置信区间)为-4.3%(-9.4%,0.8%);在hCG标准满足当天接受hCG治疗的患者与延迟1天接受hCG治疗的患者相比,持续妊娠率的估计差异为1.8%(-4.1%,7.6%);在hCG给药当天接受rFSH治疗的患者与未接受rFSH治疗的患者相比,持续妊娠率的估计差异为3.2%(-2.1%,8.6%);从第8天开始接受递减剂量rFSH与固定剂量rFSH治疗的患者相比,持续妊娠率的估计差异为-5.8%(-13.0%,1.4%)。

结论

在促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案中,使用注射用重组促卵泡素α或每日使用rFSH启动卵巢刺激后,卵巢刺激的治疗灵活性对患者治疗的临床结局没有实质性影响。

试验注册

该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符为NCT00696800。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e30e/3691650/6bbace9b0a61/1477-7827-11-52-1.jpg

相似文献

2
Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
5
Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Apr;24(4):410-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
8
Corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Jul;33(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
Corifollitropin alfa: a review of its use in controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction.
BioDrugs. 2011 Aug 1;25(4):243-54. doi: 10.2165/11206890-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2.
2
Corifollitropin Alfa for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: State of the Art.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;45(1):43-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759631. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Long-acting FSH versus daily FSH for women undergoing assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD009577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009577.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Is it possible to reduce the incidence of weekend oocyte retrievals in GnRH antagonist protocols?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Jan;26(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
3
Comment on, "Is there a place for corifollitropin alfa in IVF/ICSI cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis".
Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):e22; author reply e23. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.047. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
4
Is there a place for corifollitropin alfa in IVF/ICSI cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):876-85. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.092. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
7
GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice?
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):510-24. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr008. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
9
Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
10
Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in IVF: a randomized trial in lower-body-weight women.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jul;21(1):66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验