Eye Hospital, D-45879 Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(5):571-8. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130322.
To evaluate the effect of transpalpebral electrotherapy on patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
22 patients were randomized in two groups to either receive therapy (n = 12) or placebo (n = 10). There was no statistically significant difference for age and initial visual acuity (VA) between the two groups (p = 0.6; ANOVA). Treatment was performed on 5 consecutive days. On each day two sessions were applied. Every session included 8 spots (40 sec/spot) around the eye globe. The current applied (changing frequency 5-80 Hz) varied individually between 150 and 220 μA. Patients were examined before treatment, at the end of the 5-day treatment period, after 4 weeks and at 6 months. Examinations included a standardized VA testing, using ETDRS letters, contrast sensitivity, macular sensitivity and fixation stability using microperimetry and measurements with SD-OCT.
At the end of week 1, mean VA improved markedly (p = 0.001; T test), with 7 out of 12 patients showing an improvement of more than 5 letters. After 4 weeks, there was an improvement of more than 10 letters in 3 patients (mean + 5.7 letters; p = 0.001; T test) whereas at 6 months a loss of 1.6 letters was observed. Only 4 (33%) of our patients did not show any improvement at all. Contrast sensitivity displayed a similar pattern. Within one week after treatment, there was a rapid improvement (+4.4 optotypes; p = 0.006; T test). After 6 months, contrast sensitivity declined again (+1.5 optotypes; p = 0.2; T test). Compared to the placebo group changes on VA failed statistical significance (p = 0.1 at 4 week; T test) whereas changes on contrast sensitivity were statistically significant (p = 0.01 at week 4; T test). No adverse events were seen or reported during the study period.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a transpalpebral electrostimulation in patients with dry AMD that demonstrates a temporary increase in visual function in some of these patients; results that seem to justify further research on this potential treatment option for dry AMD.
评估经皮电刺激治疗对干性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的疗效。
将 22 名患者随机分为两组,一组接受治疗(n = 12),另一组接受安慰剂治疗(n = 10)。两组之间的年龄和初始视力(VA)无统计学差异(p = 0.6;ANOVA)。治疗连续进行 5 天。每天进行两次治疗。每次治疗包括眼球周围的 8 个部位(40 秒/部位)。所应用的电流(频率在 5-80 Hz 之间变化)因人而异,介于 150-220 μA 之间。患者在治疗前、治疗结束时(第 5 天)、4 周后和 6 个月后接受检查。检查包括使用 ETDRS 字母进行标准化视力测试、对比敏感度、黄斑敏感度和使用微视野计和 SD-OCT 进行固视稳定性测量。
第 1 周结束时,平均 VA 明显改善(p = 0.001;T 检验),12 名患者中有 7 名 VA 提高超过 5 个字母。4 周后,3 名患者 VA 提高超过 10 个字母(平均提高 5.7 个字母;p = 0.001;T 检验),而 6 个月时 VA 下降 1.6 个字母。我们的患者中只有 4 名(33%)没有任何改善。对比敏感度也呈现出类似的模式。治疗后 1 周内,对比敏感度迅速提高(+4.4 个视标;p = 0.006;T 检验)。6 个月后,对比敏感度再次下降(+1.5 个视标;p = 0.2;T 检验)。与安慰剂组相比,VA 的变化无统计学意义(p = 0.1,4 周时;T 检验),而对比敏感度的变化有统计学意义(p = 0.01,4 周时;T 检验)。研究期间未出现或报告任何不良事件。
据我们所知,这是首例报道经皮电刺激治疗干性 AMD 患者的研究,该研究显示一些患者的视觉功能暂时提高;这些结果似乎证明了对干性 AMD 这种潜在治疗选择进行进一步研究是合理的。