Lin Tong, Gong Lan, Sun Xing-Huai, Zhao Nai-Qing, Chen Wei, Yuan Hui-Ping, Shao Yan, Gao Ming-Hong, Tang Hai
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Apr 29;7:361-8. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S42624. Print 2013.
Parallel comparison with 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) ophthalmic gel to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel for the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis (HSK).
This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study. HSK patients were randomly divided into two groups, with the corresponding treatment of 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel or 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel. Symptoms and signs were observed before administration, and 3 (±1), 7 (±1), 14 (±2), and 21 (±3) days after the administration. The clinical effective rate was considered as the primary outcome. The safety profile was evaluated by AEs, visual acuity, and ocular tolerance.
The clinical effective rate in the per-protocol (PP) dataset for the treatment group and the control group were 95.10% and 93.00%, respectively (P = 0.5282). The noninferiority test showed significant differences (P = 0.000305, P < 0.025), indicating that the tested drug was noninferior to the control. Patients in the PP dataset of both groups experienced decreases in the total scores of clinical indicators. Ocular AEs were few but similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between patients' visions between the two groups before and after administration in the safety analysis set. In terms of drug tolerance, the rates of patients without transient blurred vision during all the visits in the treatment group were higher than those for the control group (P < 0.05). During the third and fourth visits, the rates of patients with eye itching were 4.08% and 1.22% in the treatment group, and 13.59% and 8.14% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). During the second visit, the rates of patients with eye irritation were 14.42% in the treatment group and 25.71% in the control group (P < 0.05).
The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel was effective and safe for the treatment of HSK, and was not inferior to 0.15% GCV ophthalmic gel. The 0.15% GCV in situ ophthalmic gel presented superior ocular tolerance.
与0.15%更昔洛韦(GCV)眼用凝胶进行平行比较,以评估0.15%GCV原位眼用凝胶治疗单纯疱疹性角膜炎(HSK)的有效性和安全性。
这是一项多中心、随机、研究者设盲、平行组研究。HSK患者被随机分为两组,分别给予相应的0.15%GCV眼用凝胶或0.15%GCV原位眼用凝胶治疗。在给药前以及给药后3(±1)、7(±1)、14(±2)和21(±3)天观察症状和体征。将临床有效率视为主要结局。通过不良事件、视力和眼部耐受性评估安全性。
治疗组和对照组符合方案(PP)数据集的临床有效率分别为95.10%和93.00%(P = 0.5282)。非劣效性检验显示有显著差异(P = 0.000305,P < 0.025),表明受试药物不劣于对照药物。两组PP数据集中的患者临床指标总分均有所下降。眼部不良事件较少,但两组相似。在安全性分析集中,两组患者给药前后的视力无显著差异。在药物耐受性方面,治疗组在所有访视期间无短暂视力模糊的患者比例高于对照组(P < 0.05)。在第三次和第四次访视时,治疗组眼部瘙痒患者的比例分别为4.08%和1.22%,对照组分别为13.59%和8.14%(P < 0.05)。在第二次访视时,治疗组眼部刺激患者的比例为14.42%,对照组为25.71%(P < 0.05)。
0.15%GCV原位眼用凝胶治疗HSK有效且安全,不劣于0.15%GCV眼用凝胶。0.15%GCV原位眼用凝胶具有更好的眼部耐受性。