Suppr超能文献

比较 3D 适形、调强和质子放射治疗前列腺癌的剂量学、发病率、生活质量和癌症控制结果。

Comparing dosimetric, morbidity, quality of life, and cancer control outcomes after 3D conformal, intensity-modulated, and proton radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jul;23(3):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.01.004.

Abstract

New radiation technologies have been developed and adopted for clinical use in prostate cancer treatment in response to a need to deliver dose-escalated radiation therapy while minimizing treatment-related morbidity. The goal of this article is to examine the currently available evidence comparing dosimetric and patient outcomes of newer versus older radiation technologies in prostate cancer. Overall, although a body of dosimetry studies have demonstrated the ability of newer versus older technologies (intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy; proton vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy) to reduce radiation doses delivered to the rectum and bladder, more studies are needed to demonstrate that these dosimetric benefits translate into improved patient outcomes.

摘要

为了满足在尽量减少治疗相关发病率的同时提供剂量递增放疗的需求,新的放射治疗技术已经被开发并应用于前列腺癌的临床治疗中。本文的目的是研究比较前列腺癌中较新和较旧放射技术的剂量学和患者结果的现有证据。总的来说,尽管大量的剂量学研究已经证明了较新技术(调强放疗与三维适形放疗;质子与调强放疗)与较旧技术相比能够降低直肠和膀胱的放射剂量,但仍需要更多的研究来证明这些剂量学上的优势转化为改善患者的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验