National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(8):419-24. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.801246.
Twenty subjects underwent quantitative respirator fit testing with two styles (flat fold, cup-shaped) of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (N95 FFRs). Passing a fit test was followed by stereophotogrammetry to determine the face seal area and computation of seal pressure. There were significantly different seal pressures (p < 0.01) between standard size flat fold and cup-shaped N95 FFRs but no significant differences in face seal area. No significant differences were noted in fit factors, but more individuals passed fit testing wearing flat fold respirators. The ability of flat fold N95 FFRs, at lower seal pressures, to obtain similar fit factors as cup-shaped N95 FFR at higher seal pressures offers the possibility of enhanced facial comfort without a loss of protection. Stereophotogrammetry offers a relatively simple, non-invasive technology to evaluate various properties of N95 FFR fit.
20 名受试者分别使用两种样式(折叠式、杯状)的 N95 过滤式口罩(N95 FFR)进行定量呼吸机适配性测试。通过适配性测试后,使用立体摄影测量法来确定面部密封区域,并计算密封压力。标准尺寸的折叠式和杯状 N95 FFR 的密封压力有显著差异(p < 0.01),但面部密封区域没有显著差异。拟合因子没有显著差异,但更多的人佩戴折叠式口罩通过了适配性测试。折叠式 N95 FFR 在较低的密封压力下能够获得与杯状 N95 FFR 在较高密封压力下相似的拟合因子,这为提高面部舒适度而不降低保护水平提供了可能性。立体摄影测量法提供了一种相对简单、非侵入性的技术来评估 N95 FFR 适配性的各种特性。