Sezione Fisiologia Umana, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via L. Mangiagalli 32, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;228(4):527-39. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3584-3. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
Coupling stability during cyclic arm movements in the horizontal (transverse) plane is lower in ISO- than in ANTI-directional coupling. We proposed that such impairment arises from the interference exerted in ISO by the anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) linked to the primary movements. To evaluate if a link between coupling stability and postural adjustments also exist for arm movements with different postural requirements, we focused on arm(s) flexion-extension in the parasagittal plane and started by analysing the APAs distribution in arm, trunk and leg muscles. Fast flexion and extension of the right arm elicited APAs in the left anterior and posterior deltoid that replicated the excitation-inhibition of the homologous prime movers; this pattern would favour ISO and contrast ANTI-coupled movements. Instead, in the left latissimus dorsi, APAs were opposite to the voluntary actions in the right latissimus dorsi, thus favouring ANTI coupling. Symmetrical APAs were also elicited in right and left erector spinae (RES, LES) and asymmetrical APAs in Ischiocruralis (RIC, LIC), while an antero-posterior force (Fy) and a moment about the vertical axis (Tz) were discharged to the ground. When fast discrete movements were ISO-coupled, APAs were symmetrical in trunk (RES, LES) and leg (RIC, LIC) muscles and a large Fy but no Tz was generated. In ANTI coupling, APAs in RES and LES remained symmetrical, whereas they became antisymmetrical in RIC and LIC. A large Tz and a small Fy were recorded. In conclusion, during parasagittal movements, APAs in are elicited in both ISO and ANTI coupling, at variance with horizontal movements where they are only present in ISO. This would suggest that the difference in coupling stability between the two modes is smaller (or even reversed) in parasagittal with respect to horizontal arm movements.
在水平(横切)平面内进行周期性手臂运动时,ISO 方向的耦合稳定性比 ANTI 方向低。我们提出,这种损伤是由于与主要运动相关的预期姿势调整(APAs)在 ISO 中产生的干扰引起的。为了评估耦合稳定性与姿势调整之间是否存在关联,我们将研究具有不同姿势要求的手臂运动,我们将重点放在矢状面内的手臂(s)屈伸运动上,并首先分析手臂、躯干和腿部肌肉中的 APA 分布。右臂快速屈伸会引起左侧三角肌前、后束的 APA,这种模式会复制对同源原动肌的兴奋-抑制;这种模式有利于 ISO,与 ANTI 耦合运动相反。然而,在左侧背阔肌中,APAs 与右侧背阔肌的自主运动相反,从而有利于 ANTI 耦合。右侧和左侧竖脊肌(RES、LES)也会引起对称的 APA,而臀大肌和臀中肌(RIC、LIC)会引起不对称的 APA,同时向地面释放前后力(Fy)和垂直轴力矩(Tz)。当快速离散运动为 ISO 耦合时,躯干(RES、LES)和腿部(RIC、LIC)肌肉中的 APA 是对称的,同时产生较大的 Fy 但没有 Tz。在 ANTI 耦合中,RES 和 LES 中的 APA 仍然是对称的,而 RIC 和 LIC 中的 APA 则变为不对称。记录到较大的 Tz 和较小的 Fy。总之,在矢状面运动中,ISO 和 ANTI 耦合都会引起 APA,与水平运动不同,后者仅存在于 ISO 中。这表明在矢状面相对于水平手臂运动,两种模式之间的耦合稳定性差异较小(甚至相反)。