Suppr超能文献

由护士主导的用于监测生物疗法的风湿病诊所的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic for monitoring biological therapy.

作者信息

Larsson Ingrid, Fridlund Bengt, Arvidsson Barbro, Teleman Annika, Bergman Stefan

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Sweden.

Research and Development Centre, Spenshult Hospital, Oskarström, Sweden.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jan;70(1):164-75. doi: 10.1111/jan.12183. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

Abstract

AIM

To compare and evaluate the treatment outcomes of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic and a rheumatologist-led clinic in patients with low disease activity or in remission who are undergoing biological therapy.

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis treated with biological therapy are usually monitored by rheumatologists. Nurse-led rheumatology clinics have been proposed in patients with low disease activity or in remission.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

A 12-month follow-up trial was conducted between October 2009 and August 2011, where 107 patients were randomized into two groups with a 6-month follow-up to a nurse-led rheumatology clinic based on person-centred care (intervention group; n = 53) or to a rheumatologist-led clinic (control group; n = 54). The hypothesis was that the nurse-led clinic outcomes would not be inferior to those obtained from a rheumatologist-led clinic at the 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was disease activity measured by Disease Activity Score 28.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients in the intervention group and 50 in the control group completed the 12-month trial. The trial revealed no statistically significant differences between groups in mean change of Disease Activity Score 28, Visual Analogue Scales for pain, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, satisfaction with or confidence in obtaining rheumatology care.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stable chronic inflammatory arthritis undergoing biological therapy could be monitored by a nurse-led rheumatology clinic without difference in outcome as measured by the Disease Activity Score 28.

摘要

目的

比较并评估由护士主导的风湿病诊所和由风湿病专家主导的诊所在接受生物治疗的疾病活动度低或病情缓解的患者中的治疗效果。

背景

接受生物治疗的慢性炎症性关节炎患者通常由风湿病专家进行监测。对于疾病活动度低或病情缓解的患者,已提出由护士主导的风湿病诊所。

设计

随机对照试验。

方法

在2009年10月至2011年8月期间进行了一项为期12个月的随访试验,107例患者被随机分为两组,一组接受基于以患者为中心护理的护士主导的风湿病诊所6个月随访(干预组;n = 53),另一组接受风湿病专家主导的诊所随访(对照组;n = 54)。假设是在12个月随访时,护士主导的诊所的治疗效果不会低于风湿病专家主导的诊所。主要结局指标是用疾病活动度评分28来衡量疾病活动度。

结果

干预组共有47例患者,对照组有50例患者完成了12个月的试验。试验显示,两组在疾病活动度评分28的平均变化、疼痛视觉模拟量表、健康评估问卷、对获得风湿病护理的满意度或信心方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

接受生物治疗的病情稳定的慢性炎症性关节炎患者可由护士主导的风湿病诊所进行监测,以疾病活动度评分28衡量的结局无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/4285750/926d23c25602/jan0070-0164-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验