University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain,
Ann Dyslexia. 2013 Oct;63(3-4):239-52. doi: 10.1007/s11881-013-0082-z. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
This study explores whether activation and inhibition word processes contribute to the characteristic speed deficits found in transparent orthographies (Wimmer, Appl Psycholinguist 14:1-33, 1993). A second and fourth grade sample of normal school readers and dyslexic school readers participated in a lexical decision task. Words were manipulated according to two factors: word frequency (high vs. low) and syllable frequency (high vs. low). It has been repeatedly found that words with high-frequency syllables require extra time for deactivating the lexical syllabic neighbors: the so-called inhibitory effect of positional frequency syllable (Carreiras et al., J Mem Lang 32:766-780, 1993). We hypothesized that dyslexic readers would show a stronger inhibitory effect than normal readers because they are slower decoders and they may also be slower at the activation and inhibition of word representations that are competing (i.e., syllabic candidates). Results indicated an interaction between word and syllable frequency (i.e., a strong inhibitory effect was found in the low-frequency word condition). According to our hypothesis, the inhibitory effect size was almost three times bigger in dyslexics than in the normal readers. This difference shows an alteration, not a developmental lag. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect size did not interact with school grade. Thus, reading experience did not impact the lexical processes involved on the inhibitory effect. Our outcomes showed how activation and/or inhibition of lexical processes can contribute to the lack of speed beyond decoding deficit.
本研究探讨了激活和抑制词加工是否有助于透明正字法中发现的特征速度缺陷(Wimmer,Appl Psycholinguist 14:1-33, 1993)。正常学校读者和阅读障碍学校读者的二年级和四年级样本参加了词汇判断任务。单词根据两个因素进行操纵:词频(高 vs. 低)和音节频率(高 vs. 低)。已经反复发现,具有高频音节的单词需要额外的时间来停用词汇音节邻居:所谓的位置频率音节的抑制效应(Carreiras 等人,J Mem Lang 32:766-780, 1993)。我们假设阅读障碍者比正常读者表现出更强的抑制效应,因为他们的解码速度较慢,并且他们可能在激活和抑制竞争的单词表示(即音节候选者)方面也较慢。结果表明词频和音节频之间存在交互作用(即低频词条件下发现了很强的抑制效应)。根据我们的假设,阅读障碍者的抑制效应大小几乎是正常读者的三倍。这种差异表明存在改变,而不是发展滞后。有趣的是,抑制效应大小与学校年级没有相互作用。因此,阅读经验并没有影响涉及抑制效应的词汇过程。我们的研究结果表明,词汇过程的激活和/或抑制如何有助于超越解码缺陷的速度不足。