Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Jon J. van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Transfusion. 2014 Feb;54(2):278-84. doi: 10.1111/trf.12312. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
Exposure to allogenic red blood cells (RBCs) may lead to formation of antibodies against nonself-antigens in transfused patients. While alloimmunization rates are known to increase with the number of transfusions, the transfusion course in patients can vary from receiving multiple units during a single transfusion event or getting them dispersed over a long(er) period. In this study we compared the immunization risk between different transfusion intensities.
An incident new-user cohort study was conducted among consecutive transfused patients at two university medical centers. All patients who received their first RBC transfusion within the study period from January 2005 to December 2011 were eligible. Intensive transfusions were defined as at least 5, at least 10, and at least 20 RBC units within 48 hours. Alloimmunization hazard ratios (HRs), comparing patients receiving intensive transfusions to patients never receiving intensive transfusions, were estimated.
The study cohort was composed of 5812 patients who had received a median of 7 (interquartile range, 4-12) units. RBC alloantibodies were formed by 156 patients. The adjusted Cox regression HRs for alloimmunization, with number of units as the time covariate and adjusted for patient age, sex, and follow-up time after first transfusion, ranged from 0.8 to 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.6).
The occurrence of RBC alloimmunization in patients receiving intensive transfusions did not differ significantly from patients receiving nonintensive transfusions.
接受异体红细胞(RBC)输注可能会导致输注患者体内针对非自身抗原的抗体形成。虽然已知同种免疫率随着输注次数的增加而增加,但患者的输血过程可能会有所不同,有的患者在一次输血事件中接受多个单位的输血,有的则在较长时间内分散接受。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同输血强度下的免疫风险。
在两个大学医学中心,对连续接受输血的患者进行了一项以事件为基础的新用户队列研究。在 2005 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间,符合以下条件的患者有资格入组:首次接受 RBC 输血,且在 48 小时内至少接受 5 个、至少 10 个或至少 20 个 RBC 单位的输血。使用 Cox 回归分析来比较接受强化输血的患者与从未接受强化输血的患者之间的同种免疫危险比(HR)。
研究队列包括 5812 名患者,他们接受了中位数为 7(四分位距,4-12)个单位的输血。156 名患者形成了 RBC 同种抗体。调整后的 Cox 回归 HR 为同种免疫,单位数作为时间协变量,调整了患者年龄、性别和首次输血后的随访时间,范围为 0.8 至 1.2(95%置信区间,0.4-2.6)。
接受强化输血的患者发生 RBC 同种免疫的情况与接受非强化输血的患者无显著差异。