Suppr超能文献

瑞典重症监护病房机械通气临床指南和日常实践中对证据的应用。

Use of evidence in clinical guidelines and everyday practice for mechanical ventilation in Swedish intensive care units.

机构信息

Research Fellow, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2013 Nov;10(4):198-207. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12008. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

One way to support evidence-based decisions in health care is by clinical guidelines, in particular, in highly specialized care such as intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to explore the development and dissemination of guidelines regarding mechanical ventilation (MV) in Swedish ICUs, and the use of evidence on MV in guidelines and everyday practice.

METHODS

Inviting all general ICUs in Sweden (N = 65), a national survey was performed on occurrence of MV guidelines, and a review of submitted ICU guidelines by four evidence items from the AGREE instrument. In addition, ICU head nurses and senior physicians were interviewed using semistructured and open-ended questions to explore development and dissemination of MV guidelines, staff adherence or nonadherence to guidelines, and everyday practice of MV management bedside.

FINDINGS

Fifty-five ICUs (85%) participated in the study; 51 ICUs submitted a total of 245 guidelines, including recommendations for medical or nursing MV actions. None of the documents included how evidence had been sought or assessed, while 22% included a list of references (n = 54). No guidelines included patients' experiences of MV. According to the managers, the guidelines were most often compiled by a multiprofessional team sharing the information through the ICU's website. The guidelines were mainly used as a basis for MV management bedside, but variation occurred as a result of personal preferences, lack of awareness, and adjustment to patients' needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Local MV guidelines seem to constitute a basis for healthcare practice in Swedish ICUs, even though the evidence proposed was limited with respect to how it was attained and lacked patient perspectives. In addition, the strategies used for dissemination were limited, suggesting that further initiatives are needed to support knowledge translation in advanced healthcare environments such as ICUs.

摘要

背景与目的

支持医疗保健循证决策的一种方法是通过临床指南,特别是在高度专业化的护理中,如重症监护病房(ICU)。本研究旨在探讨瑞典 ICU 中机械通气(MV)指南的制定和传播,以及指南和日常实践中 MV 证据的使用。

方法

邀请瑞典所有普通 ICU(N=65)参与,对 MV 指南的发生情况进行了全国性调查,并对提交的 ICU 指南进行了四项来自 AGREE 工具的证据项目进行了审查。此外,还对 ICU 护士长和高级医师进行了半结构化和开放式问题访谈,以探讨 MV 指南的制定和传播、员工对指南的遵守或不遵守情况,以及床边 MV 管理的日常实践。

结果

55 个 ICU(85%)参与了研究;51 个 ICU 共提交了 245 份指南,其中包括医疗或护理 MV 措施的建议。没有一份文件包括如何寻求或评估证据,而 22%的文件包括参考文献列表(n=54)。没有指南包括患者对 MV 的体验。根据管理人员的说法,这些指南通常由一个多专业团队编写,通过 ICU 的网站共享信息。这些指南主要用作床边 MV 管理的基础,但由于个人偏好、缺乏意识以及对患者需求的调整,会出现变化。

结论

当地的 MV 指南似乎构成了瑞典 ICU 医疗实践的基础,尽管提出的证据在获取方式和缺乏患者视角方面都有限。此外,用于传播的策略有限,这表明需要进一步采取举措,以支持 ICU 等先进医疗环境中的知识转化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验