Suppr超能文献

逆行腘动脉入路治疗股腘动脉挑战性闭塞。

Retrograde popliteal approach for challenging occlusions of the femoral-popliteal arteries.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.038.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Antegrade ipsilateral subintimal angioplasty for recanalization of the superficial femoral arteries (SFAs) has a failure rate of 10%-20%. We report our initial experiences performing recanalization of the SFA or popliteal artery (PA) in cases of failed antegrade angioplasty using a medial infracondylar retrograde popliteal approach with the patient supine.

METHODS

Between February 2010 and December 2011, 19 patients with chronic total occlusion of the SFA and/or proximal PA (mean occlusion length, 20.5 ± 5.54 cm) underwent transpopliteal procedures after failure of an antegrade procedure. Upon failure to re-enter the true lumen distal to the occlusion during initial antegrade recanalization with the patient supine, a medial retrograde popliteal access at the infracondylar plane was adopted, without turning the patient (with the leg in a 60° external rotation and the knee in a gentle flexion). Puncture of the distal PA was guided fluoroscopically and a guidewire was inserted into the true lumen, after which retrograde recanalization proceeded in accordance with standard protocol. Once the occlusion was crossed from distal to proximal, the wire was advanced through a 6F sheath in the common femoral artery. The preferred approach for angioplasty and stenting was from the femoral artery. Hemostasis at the popliteal access was achieved by combined intraluminal balloon dilatation and manual compression (3-5 minutes). The mean follow-up period was 8.6 ± 4.1 months and included measuring the ankle-brachial index and duplex ultrasound.

RESULTS

Technical success (puncture of the PA and SFA recanalization) was achieved in all cases. All but one patient received stent implantation from the antegrade approach. Sheaths were used in five (26%) patients; four patients were treated with a 4F sheath and one with a 6F sheath. There was one (5.26%) major complication (a popliteal access site occlusion) and two (10.5%) minor complications (small hematomas in the popliteal region). The primary patency at 6 months was 84.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The medial infracondylar retrograde popliteal approach with the patient in the supine position can be considered safe and efficient for recanalization of the SFA or proximal PA after failure of an antegrade approach.

摘要

目的

经皮顺行同侧内膜下血管成形术(ISA)再通股浅动脉(SFA)的失败率为 10%-20%。我们报告了我们的初步经验,在顺行血管成形术失败后,采用仰卧位的腘窝内侧下髁后逆行入路,对 SFA 或腘动脉(PA)进行再通。

方法

2010 年 2 月至 2011 年 12 月,19 例 SFA 和/或近端 PA 慢性完全闭塞患者(平均闭塞长度 20.5±5.54cm)在顺行再通失败后行经腘窝入路。在初始仰卧位顺行再通过程中,当无法在闭塞段远端重新进入真腔时,采用腘窝内侧下髁平面逆行入路,无需翻转患者(腿部外旋 60°,膝关节轻度弯曲)。在透视引导下穿刺远端 PA,并将导丝插入真腔,然后按照标准方案进行逆行再通。一旦从远端到近端穿过闭塞段,将导丝通过股总动脉的 6F 鞘推进。首选的血管成形术和支架置入方法是从股动脉入路。在腘窝入路处,通过腔内球囊扩张和手动压迫(3-5 分钟)实现止血。平均随访时间为 8.6±4.1 个月,包括测量踝肱指数和双功能超声。

结果

所有病例均成功实现技术成功(穿刺 PA 和 SFA 再通)。除 1 例患者外,其余患者均从前向入路接受支架植入。5 例(26%)患者使用鞘管;4 例患者使用 4F 鞘管,1 例患者使用 6F 鞘管。发生 1 例(5.26%)主要并发症(腘窝入路闭塞)和 2 例(10.5%)小并发症(腘窝小血肿)。6 个月时的原发性通畅率为 84.2%。

结论

在顺行入路失败后,仰卧位的腘窝内侧下髁后逆行入路可以安全有效地用于 SFA 或近端 PA 的再通。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验