Suppr超能文献

4枚无头加压螺钉的植入情况

Insertion profiles of 4 headless compression screws.

作者信息

Hart Adam, Harvey Edward J, Lefebvre Louis-Philippe, Barthelat Francois, Rabiei Reza, Martineau Paul A

机构信息

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Sep;38(9):1728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In practice, the surgeon must rely on screw position (insertion depth) and tactile feedback from the screwdriver (insertion torque) to gauge compression. In this study, we identified the relationship between interfragmentary compression and these 2 factors.

METHODS

The Acutrak Standard, Acutrak Mini, Synthes 3.0, and Herbert-Whipple implants were tested using a polyurethane foam scaphoid model. A specialized testing jig simultaneously measured compression force, insertion torque, and insertion depth at half-screw-turn intervals until failure occurred.

RESULTS

The peak compression occurs at an insertion depth of -3.1 mm, -2.8 mm, 0.9 mm, and 1.5 mm for the Acutrak Mini, Acutrak Standard, Herbert-Whipple, and Synthes screws respectively (insertion depth is positive when the screw is proud above the bone and negative when buried). The compression and insertion torque at a depth of -2 mm were found to be 113 ± 18 N and 0.348 ± 0.052 Nm for the Acutrak Standard, 104 ± 15 N and 0.175 ± 0.008 Nm for the Acutrak Mini, 78 ± 9 N and 0.245 ± 0.006 Nm for the Herbert-Whipple, and 67 ± 2N, 0.233 ± 0.010 Nm for the Synthes headless compression screws.

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 screws generated a sizable amount of compression (> 60 N) over a wide range of insertion depths. The compression at the commonly recommended insertion depth of -2 mm was not significantly different between screws; thus, implant selection should not be based on compression profile alone. Conically shaped screws (Acutrak) generated their peak compression when they were fully buried in the foam whereas the shanked screws (Synthes and Herbert-Whipple) reached peak compression before they were fully inserted. Because insertion torque correlated poorly with compression, surgeons should avoid using tactile judgment of torque as a proxy for compression.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Knowledge of the insertion profile may improve our understanding of the implants, provide a better basis for comparing screws, and enable the surgeon to optimize compression.

摘要

目的

在实际操作中,外科医生必须依靠螺钉位置(插入深度)和螺丝刀的触觉反馈(插入扭矩)来评估加压情况。在本研究中,我们确定了骨折块间加压与这两个因素之间的关系。

方法

使用聚氨酯泡沫舟骨模型对Acutrak标准型、Acutrak微型、Synthes 3.0型和Herbert-Whipple植入物进行测试。一个专门的测试夹具以半圈螺钉旋转间隔同时测量压缩力、插入扭矩和插入深度,直至出现失效。

结果

Acutrak微型、Acutrak标准型、Herbert-Whipple型和Synthes螺钉的峰值加压分别出现在插入深度为-3.1毫米、-2.8毫米、0.9毫米和1.5毫米时(当螺钉突出于骨表面时插入深度为正,当埋入骨内时为负)。发现Acutrak标准型螺钉在-2毫米深度处的压缩力和插入扭矩分别为113±18牛和0.348±0.052牛米,Acutrak微型螺钉为104±15牛和0.175±0.008牛米,Herbert-Whipple型螺钉为78±9牛和0.245±0.006牛米,Synthes无头加压螺钉为67±2牛、0.233±0.010牛米。

结论

所有4种螺钉在广泛的插入深度范围内都能产生相当大的压力(>60牛)。在通常推荐的-2毫米插入深度下,各螺钉之间的压缩力无显著差异;因此,植入物的选择不应仅基于加压情况。锥形螺钉(Acutrak)在完全埋入泡沫时产生峰值加压,而带柄螺钉(Synthes和Herbert-Whipple)在完全插入之前达到峰值加压。由于插入扭矩与压缩力的相关性较差,外科医生应避免将扭矩的触觉判断作为压缩力的替代指标。

临床意义

了解插入情况可能会增进我们对植入物的理解,为比较螺钉提供更好的基础,并使外科医生能够优化加压效果。

相似文献

1
Insertion profiles of 4 headless compression screws.
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Sep;38(9):1728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
2
Fixation strength of four headless compression screws.
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Oct;38(10):1037-43. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
3
A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jun 7;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-27.
4
Partially threaded headless screw may benefit adequate interfragmentary compression and reduced driving torque for small bone fixation.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499018760130. doi: 10.1177/2309499018760130.
5
Biomechanical analysis of second-generation headless compression screws.
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
7
Effect of interfragmentary gap on compression force in a headless compression screw used for scaphoid fixation.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Jan;43(1):93-96. doi: 10.1177/1753193417702565. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
10
The durability of the intrascaphoid compression of headless compression screws: in vitro study.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jun;37(6):1142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.018.

引用本文的文献

2
Which Headless Compression Screw Produces the Highest Interfragmentary Compression Force in Scaphoid Fracture?
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Apr 22;54(5):548-564. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00107-5. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Factors Associated with Scaphoid Nonunion following Early Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):141-149. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402769. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Headless Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Mechanical Comparative Analysis.
Hand (N Y). 2019 Mar;14(2):187-192. doi: 10.1177/1558944717731859. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Inter-fragmentary Compression Pressures: Lag Screw versus Herbert Screw for Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Sep;60(5):498-503. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.011. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
7
Effect of Screw Perpendicularity on Compression in Scaphoid Waist Fractures.
J Wrist Surg. 2017 Aug;6(3):178-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1596059. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
An Unexpected Complication after Headless Compression Screw Fixation of an Osteochondral Fracture of Patella.
Case Rep Orthop. 2016;2016:7290104. doi: 10.1155/2016/7290104. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
9
Characterization of a Pre-Clinical Mini-Pig Model of Scaphoid Non-Union.
J Funct Biomater. 2015 Jun 16;6(2):407-21. doi: 10.3390/jfb6020407.

本文引用的文献

1
Central versus eccentric internal fixation of acute scaphoid fractures.
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jan;38(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.035. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
2
Interfragmentary compression profile of 4 headless bone screws: an analysis of the compression lost on reinsertion.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1845-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
3
The durability of the intrascaphoid compression of headless compression screws: in vitro study.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jun;37(6):1142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.018.
4
Acutrak versus Herbert screw fixation for scaphoid non-union and delayed union.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012 Apr;20(1):61-5. doi: 10.1177/230949901202000112.
5
Scaphoid fracture epidemiology.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):E41-5. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e31822458e8.
6
The fixation strength of scaphoid bone screws: an in vitro investigation using polyurethane foam.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Feb;37(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.021. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
7
A biomechanical study on variation of compressive force along the Acutrak 2 screw.
Injury. 2012 Feb;43(2):205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jun 7;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-27.
9
Osseous microarchitecture of the scaphoid: Cadaveric study of regional variations and clinical implications.
Clin Anat. 2012 Mar;25(2):203-11. doi: 10.1002/ca.21198. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
Optimal fixation of acute scaphoid fractures: finite element analysis.
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Aug;35(8):1246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验