Suppr超能文献

真实世界经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中第二代与第一代药物洗脱支架的支架内血栓形成:来自一个大容量单中心前瞻性注册研究的3806例连续手术分析

Stent thrombosis with second- versus first-generation drug-eluting stents in real-world percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis of 3806 consecutive procedures from a large-volume single-center prospective registry.

作者信息

Dores Helder, Raposo Luís, Campante Teles Rui, Machado Carina, Leal Sílvio, Araújo Gonçalves Pedro, Mesquita Gabriel Henrique, Sousa Almeida Manuel, Mendes Miguel

机构信息

Cardiology Department - Santa Cruz Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Av Professor Reinaldo dos Santos, 2799-523 Carnaxide, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Jul;25(7):330-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

When compared to their first-generation (1stGEN) counterparts, second-generation (2ndGEN) drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been associated with better clinical outcomes in randomized clinical trials, namely by reducing the rates of stent thrombosis (ST). Our goal was to investigate whether or not the broad use of newer devices would translate into higher safety in a real-world population. For that purpose, we compared the occurrence of definite ST at 12 months between two patient subsets from a large-volume single-center registry, according to the type of DES used. Total mortality was a secondary endpoint.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2003 and December 2010, a total of 3806 patients were submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with only 1stGEN or 2ndGEN DES: 2388 patients (62.7%) were treated with 1stGEN DES only (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] = 1295 [34.0%]; paclitaxel-eluting stent [PES] = 943 [24.8%]; both stent types were used in 150 patients) and 1418 patients (37.3%) were treated with 2ndGEN DESs only. The total incidence of definite ST (as defined by the Academic Research Consortium) at 12 months was 1.2% (n = 46). After correction for baseline differences between study groups and other variables deemed to influence the occurrence of ST, the use of 1stGEN DES was associated with a significant 2.4-fold increase in the risk of definite ST (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-5.42; P=.039) at 12 months; adjusted risk was higher with PES (hazard ratio [HR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.48-8.70; P=.005) than with SES (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.92-5.65; P=.074). Total mortality (3.7% vs 3.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.81-1.84, P=.348).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that in the real-world setting of contemporary PCI, the unrestricted use of newer 2ndGEN DESs translates into an improvement in PCI safety (relative to 1stGEN DESs), with a significantly lower risk of definite ST at 12 months.

摘要

背景与目的

与第一代药物洗脱支架(DES)相比,在随机临床试验中,第二代(2ndGEN)DES与更好的临床结果相关,即通过降低支架血栓形成(ST)率。我们的目标是调查在真实世界人群中,广泛使用更新的器械是否会转化为更高的安全性。为此,我们根据所使用的DES类型,比较了来自一个大容量单中心注册研究的两个患者亚组在12个月时明确ST的发生率。全因死亡率是次要终点。

方法与结果

2003年1月至2010年12月期间,共有3806例患者接受了仅使用第一代或第二代DES的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI):2388例患者(62.7%)仅接受第一代DES治疗(西罗莫司洗脱支架[SES]=1295例[34.0%];紫杉醇洗脱支架[PES]=943例[24.8%];150例患者同时使用了两种支架类型),1418例患者(37.3%)仅接受第二代DES治疗。12个月时明确ST(根据学术研究联盟定义)的总发生率为1.2%(n = 46)。在对研究组之间的基线差异和其他被认为会影响ST发生的变量进行校正后,使用第一代DES与12个月时明确ST风险显著增加2.4倍相关(95%置信区间[CI],1.05 - 5.42;P = 0.039);PES的校正风险(风险比[HR],3.6;95% CI,1.48 - 8.70;P = 0.005)高于SES(HR,2.3;95% CI,0.92 - 5.65;P = 0.074)。两组之间的全因死亡率(3.7%对3.5%)无显著差异(校正HR,1.2;95% CI,0.81 - 1.84,P = 0.348)。

结论

我们的数据表明,在当代PCI的真实世界环境中,无限制地使用更新的第二代DES可转化为PCI安全性的改善(相对于第一代DES),12个月时明确ST的风险显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验