Zhang Ying-ying, Wu Dong-yan, Fu Nai-kuan, Lu Feng-min, Xu Jing
Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
J Int Med Res. 2013 Aug;41(4):1057-66. doi: 10.1177/0300060513489798. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes were compared between single-lead atrial (AAI) or dual-chamber (DDD) pacing modes in patients with sick sinus syndrome, in a crossover study.
Inpatients scheduled for their first pacemaker implantation were screened for the following inclusion criteria: sick sinus syndrome; intact atrioventricular conduction; normal QRS interval. All study patients were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker, programmed for AAI or DDD pacing mode. Patients were allocated randomly to AAI followed by DDD pacing or to DDD followed by AAI pacing, each mode being applied for 72 h. Echocardiographic, electrocardiographic and neuroendocrine parameters were tested at the end of each pacing mode.
From 152 inpatients screened for inclusion, 28 were selected for treatment. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), endothelin, aldosterone and angiotension II were significantly lower, and aortic flow velocity-time integral was significantly higher, in AAI mode than in DDD mode. Aortic pre-ejection interval, interventricular mechanical delay and QRS duration were significantly higher in DDD than in AAI mode.
In patients with sick sinus syndrome, DDD pacing mode can induce neuroendocrine system activation, and left ventricular dysfunction and dyssynchrony. These findings discourage the routine use of DDD pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
在一项交叉研究中,比较病态窦房结综合征患者单腔心房(AAI)或双腔(DDD)起搏模式下的神经内分泌和血流动力学变化。
对计划首次植入起搏器的住院患者进行筛选,以确定以下纳入标准:病态窦房结综合征;房室传导完整;QRS间期正常。所有研究患者均植入双腔起搏器,并将其程控为AAI或DDD起搏模式。患者被随机分配为先AAI后DDD起搏,或先DDD后AAI起搏,每种模式均应用72小时。在每种起搏模式结束时测试超声心动图、心电图和神经内分泌参数。
从152名经筛选符合纳入标准的住院患者中,选择了28名进行治疗。与DDD模式相比,AAI模式下血浆心房利钠肽(ANP)、内皮素、醛固酮和血管紧张素II水平显著降低,主动脉血流速度时间积分显著升高。DDD模式下的主动脉射血前期、心室间机械延迟和QRS持续时间显著高于AAI模式。
在病态窦房结综合征患者中,DDD起搏模式可诱导神经内分泌系统激活、左心室功能障碍和不同步。这些发现不支持病态窦房结综合征患者常规使用DDD起搏。