Hadorn D, Dürr S, Thür B, Schwermer H, Clemenz C, Bruckner L, Perler L, Jemmi T
Bundesamt für Veterinärwesen BVET, Liebefeld, 3003 Bern.
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2013 Jul;155(7):399-404. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281/a000481.
The outbreak of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in Great Britain in 2001 let to discussions and especially emergency vaccination was deemed as an alternative to the culling of vast numbers of healthy animals. The project emergency vaccination for FMD in Switzerland was conducted to compare the effectiveness of conventional control strategies during a FMD outbreak alone and with ring vaccination of 3 km and 10 km, respectively. The results of this project showed that emergency vaccination conducted at the beginning of an epidemic was not favorable compared to conventional disease control strategy in Switzerland. In case of an advanced FMD epidemic, a 10 km ring vaccination could support the disease control in a positive way. However, the goal of emergency vaccination to save animal live can hardly be achieved due to actual legal basis and the consequent restriction measures within vaccination zones which will lead to welfare culling.
2001年英国口蹄疫的爆发引发了诸多讨论,特别是紧急接种疫苗被视为一种替代大量扑杀健康动物的方法。瑞士开展了口蹄疫紧急接种疫苗项目,以比较单独采用常规控制策略以及分别采用3公里和10公里环形接种疫苗在口蹄疫爆发期间的效果。该项目结果表明,在瑞士,与常规疾病控制策略相比,疫情初期进行紧急接种疫苗并不有利。在口蹄疫疫情发展后期,10公里环形接种疫苗能以积极的方式支持疾病控制。然而,由于实际的法律基础以及随之而来的疫苗接种区内的限制措施(这将导致出于福利目的的扑杀),紧急接种疫苗拯救动物生命的目标很难实现。