National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Utilization of Botanical Functional Ingredients, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, P. R. China; Key Laboratory of Tea Science of Ministry of Education, College of Horticulture and Landscape, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, P. R. China.
J Sep Sci. 2013 Sep;36(18):3026-34. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201300413. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
SDS and sodium deoxycholate (SDC) as two representative detergents have been widely used in LC-MS/MS-based shotgun analysis of membrane proteomes. However, some inherent disadvantages limit their applications such as interference with MS analysis or their weak ability to disrupt membranes. To address this, the combinative application of SDS and SDC was developed and evaluated in our study, which comprehensively used the strong ability of SDS to lyse membranes and solubilize hydrophobic membrane proteins, and the high efficiencies of an optimized acetone precipitation method and SDC in sample clean-up, protein recovery, and redissolution and digestion of precipitated proteins. The comparative study using a rat-liver-membrane-enriched sample showed that, compared with other three commonly used methods including the filter-aided sample preparation strategy, the combinative method not only increased the identified number of total proteins, membrane proteins, and integral membrane proteins by an average of 19.8, 23.9, and 24.8%, respectively, but also led to the identification of the highest number of matching peptides. All these results demonstrate that the method yielded better recovery and reliability in the identification of the proteins especially highly hydrophobic integral membrane proteins than the other three methods, and thereby has more potential in shotgun membrane proteomics.
SDS 和脱氧胆酸钠(SDC)作为两种代表性的去污剂,已广泛应用于基于 LC-MS/MS 的膜蛋白质组学的鸟枪法分析。然而,一些固有的缺点限制了它们的应用,如对 MS 分析的干扰或它们较弱的破坏膜的能力。为了解决这个问题,我们在研究中开发并评估了 SDS 和 SDC 的联合应用,该方法综合利用 SDS 裂解膜和溶解疏水性膜蛋白的强大能力,以及优化的丙酮沉淀方法和 SDC 在样品净化、蛋白质回收以及沉淀蛋白的重溶解和消化方面的高效率。使用富含大鼠肝膜的样品进行的对比研究表明,与其他三种常用方法(包括滤膜辅助样品制备策略)相比,该联合方法不仅平均分别增加了总蛋白、膜蛋白和完整膜蛋白的鉴定数量 19.8%、23.9%和 24.8%,而且还导致了匹配肽数量的最高鉴定。所有这些结果表明,与其他三种方法相比,该方法在蛋白质(尤其是高度疏水性完整膜蛋白)的鉴定中具有更好的回收率和可靠性,因此在鸟枪法膜蛋白质组学中具有更大的潜力。