• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密苏里州圣路易斯县公立学区烟草政策评估。

An evaluation of public school district tobacco policies in St. Louis County, Missouri.

机构信息

Center for Tobacco Policy Research, Washington University in St. Louis, 700 Rosedale Ave, CB 1009, St. Louis, MO 63112, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2013 Aug;83(8):525-32. doi: 10.1111/josh.12061.

DOI:10.1111/josh.12061
PMID:23834603
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One way to address tobacco use by youth is for primary and secondary schools to adopt and implement comprehensive tobacco policies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comprehensiveness of tobacco policies in St. Louis County, Missouri public school districts.

METHODS

We evaluated the strength of tobacco policies from all 23 public school districts located in the county using the Center for Tobacco Policy Research's School Tobacco Policy Index, a standardized tool for rating school tobacco policies.

RESULTS

The districts averaged a score of 24.4 of 40 possible points on the Index. Policies scored highest on the Tobacco-Free Environment domain and lowest on the Enforcement domain. Policies averaged about half of the total possible points for the Prevention and Treatment Services and Policy Organization domains.

CONCLUSION

Despite more than a decade of efforts by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to improve school tobacco policies, this study shows that policies in St. Louis County districts have yet to meet the standard of comprehensiveness. It is recommended that schools adopt policies that are comprehensive and that address all domains of the School Tobacco Policy Index.

摘要

背景

解决青少年吸烟问题的方法之一是让中小学采取并实施全面的烟草政策。本研究旨在评估密苏里州圣路易斯县公立学区烟草政策的全面性。

方法

我们使用中心烟草政策研究的学校烟草政策指数评估了该县 23 个公立学区的烟草政策的强度,这是一个标准化的工具,用于评估学校的烟草政策。

结果

各地区在指数上的平均得分为 40 分中的 24.4 分。政策在无烟环境领域得分最高,在执法领域得分最低。在预防和治疗服务以及政策组织领域,政策的平均得分约占总得分的一半。

结论

尽管疾病预防控制中心十多年来一直努力改善学校的烟草政策,但本研究表明,圣路易斯县各地区的政策仍未达到全面性的标准。建议学校采取全面的政策,涵盖学校烟草政策指数的所有领域。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of public school district tobacco policies in St. Louis County, Missouri.密苏里州圣路易斯县公立学区烟草政策评估。
J Sch Health. 2013 Aug;83(8):525-32. doi: 10.1111/josh.12061.
2
Evaluating the strength of school tobacco policies: the development of a practical rating system.评估学校烟草政策的力度:实用评级系统的开发
J Sch Health. 2009 Oct;79(10):495-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00439.x.
3
An analysis of community use policies in Missouri school districts.密苏里州学区社区使用政策分析。
J Sch Health. 2012 Apr;82(4):175-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00683.x.
4
Evaluation of school tobacco-free policies in a rural Northern Plains state.对北部平原农村一州学校无烟政策的评估。
J Sch Health. 2013 Nov;83(11):824-31. doi: 10.1111/josh.12100.
5
The Impact of Tobacco-Free School Policies on Youth Smoking Rates in Florida Public School Districts.无烟学校政策对佛罗里达州公立学区青少年吸烟率的影响。
J Sch Health. 2016 Feb;86(2):129-34. doi: 10.1111/josh.12360.
6
Health services: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006.卫生服务:2006年学校卫生政策与项目研究结果
J Sch Health. 2007 Oct;77(8):464-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00230.x.
7
The Colorado Tobacco-Free Schools and Communities Project.科罗拉多无烟学校与社区项目
J Sch Health. 1993 May;63(5):214-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1993.tb06123.x.
8
Tobacco use measurement, prediction, and intervention in elementary schools in four states: the CATCH Study.四个州小学的烟草使用测量、预测及干预:CATCH研究
Prev Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;25(4):486-94. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0080.
9
Multilevel analysis of the impact of school-level tobacco policies on adolescent smoking: the case of Michigan.多层次分析学校层面的烟草政策对青少年吸烟行为的影响:以密歇根州为例。
J Sch Health. 2013 Oct;83(10):679-89. doi: 10.1111/josh.12081.
10
Healthy and safe school environment, Part I: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006.健康与安全的学校环境,第一部分:2006年学校健康政策与项目研究结果
J Sch Health. 2007 Oct;77(8):522-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00233.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco-Free Schools in Practice: Policy Presence and Enforcement in Baltimore Schools.实践中的无烟学校:巴尔的摩学校的政策现状与执行情况
Adv Respir Med. 2025 Aug 5;93(4):28. doi: 10.3390/arm93040028.
2
Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.卫生政策实施决定因素及结果的定量评估:一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 19;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w.