Suppr超能文献

瑞芬太尼和艾司洛尔对喉镜检查和气管插管引起的眼压升高的影响:一项双盲、随机临床试验。

The effects of remifentanil and esmolol on increase in intraocular pressure due to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Tuzcu Kasim, Tuzcu Esra A, Karcioglu Murat, Davarci Isil, Coskun Mesut, Ilhan Ozgur, Daglıoglu Mutlu C, Turhanoglu Selim

机构信息

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Reanimation †Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2015 Jun-Jul;24(5):372-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829f9bfe.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil and esmolol on the elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) and hemodynamic response.

METHODS

After approval of the institutional Ethics Committee and obtaining informed consent, 60 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II status undergoing elective, nonophthalmic surgery were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were preexisting eye disease, neuromuscular disease, esophageal reflux, hiatus hernia, allergy to any of the study drugs, and the use of β-blockers, diuretics, or other antihypertensive agents. The patients were randomized into 2 groups by using the sealed-envelope method, as follows: group E (esmolol) and group R (remifentanil). A single intravenous dose of esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) or remifentanil (1 μg/kg) just before induction agents were given to patients in groups E and R, respectively. IOP, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) values were recorded before intubation and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after intubation.

RESULTS

The IOP decrease in group R was statistically significant compared with group E (P<0.01). HR values at 10 minutes after intubation were significantly decreased in group E compared with group R (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in MAP values between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that remifentanil is more effective than esmolol in preventing IOP elevation related to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, while there is no significant difference between the 2 agents in terms of HR and MAP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较瑞芬太尼和艾司洛尔对眼压(IOP)升高及血流动力学反应的影响。

方法

经机构伦理委员会批准并获得知情同意后,60例美国麻醉医师协会I-II级状态的成年患者纳入本研究,接受择期非眼科手术。排除标准为既往有眼部疾病、神经肌肉疾病、食管反流、食管裂孔疝、对任何研究药物过敏以及使用β受体阻滞剂、利尿剂或其他抗高血压药物。采用密封信封法将患者随机分为2组,如下:E组(艾司洛尔)和R组(瑞芬太尼)。分别在E组和R组患者给予诱导药物前静脉注射单剂量艾司洛尔(0.5mg/kg)或瑞芬太尼(1μg/kg)。记录插管前及插管后1、3、5和10分钟时的眼压、心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)值。

结果

与E组相比,R组眼压降低具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。与R组相比,E组插管后10分钟时的心率值显著降低(P<0.05)。两组间平均动脉压值无显著差异。

结论

得出结论,瑞芬太尼在预防喉镜检查和气管插管相关的眼压升高方面比艾司洛尔更有效,而在心率和平均动脉压方面两种药物无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验