QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2013 Aug;29(8):664-72. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318274b695.
Constipation is a common side effect of opioid therapy. Tapentadol immediate release (IR) was better tolerated than oxycodone IR in 2 clinical trials involving patients with low back or osteoarthritis pain. The objective of this study was to examine patient-reported bowel function during those trials.
Bowel function was assessed during secondary post hoc analyses using: the bowel movement questionnaire (BMQ; 10-d trial); the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnaire (PAC-SYM; 90-day trial); and laxative use (both trials). Random effects maximum likelihood regressions were run to examine PAC-SYM data. BMQ data were analyzed using 1-way analyses of variance and a multinomial logistic regression. Rates of laxative use were compared using χ(2) statistics.
The 10- and 90-day trials consistently showed that tapentadol IR caused less impairment of bowel function than oxycodone IR. BMQ data were comparable between patients receiving tapentadol IR and placebo, and better versus oxycodone IR including: lower proportion of days where bowel movement was absent (P<0.05); lower risks of reporting hard stools (P<0.001); and moderate or severe straining (P<0.001). All PAC-SYM summary scores (abdominal, rectal, stool, overall) indicated fewer symptoms among patients receiving tapentadol IR versus oxycodone IR (P<0.001). In both trials, rates of laxative use was lower for tapentadol IR treatment groups versus oxycodone IR (P<0.001).
Patient-reported bowel function associated with tapentadol IR treatment was similar to that associated with placebo (10-d trial) and significantly better than that associated with oxycodone IR treatment (10- and 90-d trials).
便秘是阿片类药物治疗的常见副作用。在两项涉及低背痛或骨关节炎疼痛患者的临床试验中,曲马多即时释放(IR)与羟考酮 IR 相比耐受性更好。本研究的目的是在这些试验中检查患者报告的肠道功能。
使用以下方法在二次事后分析中评估肠道功能:排便问卷(BMQ;10 天试验);患者便秘症状评估问卷(PAC-SYM;90 天试验);以及泻药使用情况(两项试验)。运行随机效应最大似然回归以检查 PAC-SYM 数据。使用单因素方差分析和多项逻辑回归分析 BMQ 数据。使用卡方检验比较泻药使用率。
10 天和 90 天的试验一致表明,曲马多 IR 引起的肠道功能障碍比羟考酮 IR 少。接受曲马多 IR 和安慰剂治疗的患者的 BMQ 数据相似,并且优于羟考酮 IR,包括:更少的无排便日(P<0.05);报告硬便的风险较低(P<0.001);以及中度或重度用力(P<0.001)。所有 PAC-SYM 综合评分(腹部、直肠、粪便、整体)表明,接受曲马多 IR 治疗的患者的症状少于接受羟考酮 IR 治疗的患者(P<0.001)。在两项试验中,曲马多 IR 治疗组与羟考酮 IR 治疗组相比,使用泻药的比率较低(P<0.001)。
与羟考酮 IR 治疗相比,与曲马多 IR 治疗相关的患者报告的肠道功能与安慰剂(10 天试验)相似,并且明显优于与羟考酮 IR 治疗相关的肠道功能(10 天和 90 天试验)。