多西他赛、顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶诱导化疗对晚期头颈癌的毒性作用
Toxicity of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for advanced head and neck cancer.
作者信息
Billan Salem, Kaidar-Person Orit, Atrash Fadi, Doweck Ilana, Haim Nissim, Kuten Abraham, Ronen Ohad
机构信息
Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
出版信息
Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 May;15(5):231-5.
BACKGROUND
The role of induction chemotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is under constant debate. Surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies are part of the treatment strategy in these patients, but their sequence remains to be defined.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the feasibility of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel-cisplatin-5-flurouracil (TPF) followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy or cetuximab (ERT) in the treatment of patients with advanced SCCHN.
METHODS
We reviewed the data of all patients with advanced SCCHN, stage III and IV, treated in 2007-2010. Tolerability was assessed and scored according to the proportion of patients completing the planned study protocol. Toxicity was scored using the U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 4) for classification of adverse events.
RESULTS
The study included 53 patients. TPF was initiated at a reduced dose in 13 patients (25%). Twenty-two patients (41.5%) received primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) and 42 (77%) completed treatment according to schedule. During the induction phase one patient (2%) died and 24 (45%) had one or more grade 3-4 complications. The number of patients who developed neutropenia was lower in the group that received primary GCSF prophylaxis. Secondary dose reductions were required in 21% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Induction TPF was associated with grade 3-4 toxicity. Prophylaxis with GCSF should be part of the treatment regimen.
背景
诱导化疗在晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)中的作用一直存在争议。手术、放疗、化疗和靶向治疗是这些患者治疗策略的一部分,但其顺序仍有待确定。
目的
评估多西他赛-顺铂-5-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)诱导化疗后序贯外照射放疗(EBRT)联合化疗或西妥昔单抗(ERT)治疗晚期SCCHN患者的可行性。
方法
我们回顾了2007年至2010年治疗的所有III期和IV期晚期SCCHN患者的数据。根据完成计划研究方案的患者比例评估耐受性并进行评分。使用美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准(第4版)对不良事件进行分类并对毒性进行评分。
结果
该研究纳入了53例患者。13例患者(25%)开始使用降低剂量的TPF。22例患者(41.5%)接受了粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)的一级预防,42例患者(77%)按计划完成了治疗。在诱导期,1例患者(2%)死亡,24例患者(45%)出现1种或多种3-4级并发症。接受一级GCSF预防的组中发生中性粒细胞减少的患者数量较少。21%的患者需要进行二级剂量减少。
结论
诱导TPF与3-4级毒性相关。GCSF预防应成为治疗方案的一部分。